Experience with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy(ESWL): A Report of 400 Cases.
- Author:
Young Tae MOON
1
;
Moon Mok OH
;
In Gyu CHOI
;
Kyung Do KIM
;
Sae Chul KIM
Author Information
1. Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
ESWL;
EDAP LT01;
urinary stone
- MeSH:
Anesthesia;
Colic;
Constriction, Pathologic;
Female;
Hematoma;
Humans;
Kidney;
Kidney Pelvis;
Lithotripsy;
Male;
Sex Ratio;
Shock*;
Ureter;
Urinary Calculi;
Urinary Retention
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1988;29(1):29-37
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
A total 400 patients underwent 676 treatments with E.D.A.P.-LTOI extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stones between February 25 and August 18, 1987. The results were obtained as follows; 1. sex ratio was about 3: 1, 292(73.0 %) in male and 108(27.0 %) in female patients. The average patient age was 43.9 years, with a range of 2 to 85 years. The fifth decade(30.5 %) was most followed by the forth decade (26.0 %) and sixth decade (20.7 %). 2. Treated stone locations were kidney in 286 (71.5 %);calyx in 187 (46.8%) and renal pelvis in 98 (24.5 %) and ureter in 144 (28.5 %); upper ureter in 71 (17.8%) and lower ureter 43(10.7 %). There were multiple renal stone in 83 (20.7 %), bilateral renal stone in 22(5.5 %), bilateral renal stone in 22 (5.5 %), bilateral ureteral stone in 3 (0.7 %) and unilateral renal and ureteral stones in 23 (5.8 %). The average stone size was 1.6 cm, with a range of 0.6 to 4.8 cm. 3. The average numbers of treatment were 1.4 sessions and the average treatment time was 13.7 minutes, with a range of 12 to 78 minutes. Of the patients, 81 (20.2 %) were complained severe pain but treatment interruption or anesthesia were not required. 4. The success rate of treatment-ended patients were 97.8 % in 0.6~1.0cm(137 cases), 89.2% in 1.0~2.0 cm (93 cases) and 89.2 % in 2.0~3.0 cm (37 cases). Therefore, the total average success rate was 93.6 %. 5. The method of pre-ESWL additional manipulation was used a ureteral stone `push up` in 12 (3.0 %). The post-ESWL additional measures were made in 10 (2.5%); ureteral manipulation in 8 cases and lithotomy in 2 cases. The causes of failed ESWL (21 cases) were stone components in 8, impacted stone in 8, incomplete stone localization in 4 and infundibular stricture in 1. 6. ESWL-complications were required admission and medical management in 18(4.5 %); colic in 12 (3.0 %), acute urinary retention in 2 (0.5 %) and subscapular hematoma in 1(0.3% ), Therefore, we confirmed that E.D.A.P.-LTOI ESWL is a safe and effective method for the treatment of urinary tract stones.
