Comparison of the effect of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureter lithotomy.
- Author:
Qingke CHEN
1
;
Jiumin LIU
;
Zhiyong XIAN
;
Zhanping XU
;
Yaoxiong LUO
;
Hanzhong CHEN
;
Chujin YE
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional; Kidney Pelvis; Laparoscopy; methods; Operative Time; Retroperitoneal Space; Ureter; Ureteral Calculi; surgery
- From: Journal of Southern Medical University 2016;36(1):148-150
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo compare the surgical effect of three-dimensional (3D) versus 2D laparoscopic surgery in ureter lithotomy.
METHODSFrom January 2014 to 2015 May, 45 patients with ureteral calculi were randomly allocated into 2 groups to undergo ureter lithotomy under 3D laparoscopy (25 cases) and 2D laparoscopy (20 cases). The time used for each surgical process (including the exposure, D-J tube discharge, suture and other surgical procedures) was recorded and compared between the two groups.
RESULTSThe operation was completed smoothly in all the 45 patients. In this cohort, the wound drainage tube was removed in a mean of 3.0mnplus;0.8 days after the operation, the catheter was removed after a week, and the double J tube was removed at 1 month. Follow-up intravenous pyelography at 3 months after the operation reveal ureteral stricture in none of the cases. Comparison of the surgical data showed that the time used in each surgical process was significantly shorter in the 3D group than in the 2D group (P<0.05). 3D laparoscopic surgery allowed more precise operation by providing a good sense of depth as in an open surgery to reduce the operation time.
CONCLUSIONSAs a minimally invasive surgical technique, 3D laparoscopic surgery facilitates more precise and easier operation compared with 2D laparoscopy in ureter lithotomy.
