Cross-sectional Anatomy of Ilium for Guiding Acetabular Component Placement Using High Hip Center Technique in Asian Population.
- Author:
Jian-Lin XIAO
;
Jian-Lin ZUO
;
Peng LIU
;
Yan-Guo QIN
;
Xue-Zhou LI
;
Tong LIU
;
Zhong-Li GAO
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Aged; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Ilium; anatomy & histology; diagnostic imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Radiography
- From: Chinese Medical Journal 2015;128(12):1579-1583
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUNDMany clinical studies have been published involving the use of a high hip center (HHC), achieved good follow-up. However, there is a little anatomic guidance in the literature regarding the amount of bone stock available for initial implant coverage in this area of the ilium. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the thickness and width of the human ilium and related acetabular cup coverage for guiding acetabular component placement in HHC.
METHODSA total of 120 normal hips in 60 cases of adult patients from lower extremities computer tomographic angiography Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine data were chosen for the study. After importing the data to the mimics software, we chose the cross sections every 5-mm increments from the rotational center of the hip to the cephalic of the ilium according the body sagittal axis, then we measured the thickness and width of the ilium for each cross section in axial plane, calculated the cup coverage at each chosen section.
RESULTSAt the acetabular dome, the mean thickness and width of the ilium were 49.71 ± 4.88 mm and 38.92 ± 3.67 mm, respectively, whereas at 1 cm above the dome, decreased to 41.35 ± 5.13 and 31.13 ± 3.37 respectively, and 2 cm above the dome, decreased to 31.25 ± 4.04 and 26.65 ± 3.43, respectively. Acetabular cup averaged coverage for 40-, 50-, and 60-mm hemispheric shells, was 100%, 89%, and 44% at the acetabular dome, 100%, 43.7%, and 27.5% for 1 cm above the dome, and 37.5%, 21.9%, and 14.2% for 2 cm above the dome.
CONCLUSIONSHHC reconstructions within 1 cm above the acetabular dome will be an acceptable and smaller diameter prosthesis would be better.