The observe of clinical effect of treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation by bone setting manipulation of different directions.
- Author:
Li-jiang LÜ
1
;
Ye-dao JIN
;
Ru-yun ZHENG
;
Bing-hua FAN
;
Mi-xiong YANG
;
Xiao-ming YING
;
Qi-Kai WANG
;
Wen-bo ZHANG
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH: Adult; Aged; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; surgery; therapy; Lumbar Vertebrae; pathology; Male; Manipulation, Orthopedic; methods; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome
- From: China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2009;22(4):255-258
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVETo compare the effect between lumbar backwards flexion manipulation and rotating manipulation for treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.
METHODSTwo hundred and nine patients of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, male 131, female 78, the age from 20 to 79 years old, 58 cases of all these patients age above 50. According to diagnosis the ladder of the 92 cases bulging type, 69 hernia type, 48 cases free type. The patients were randomly divided into treatment group (107 cases) and control group (102 cases). All the patients were treated with the three-dimensional computer-controlled traction therapeutic apparatus, with continued traction for 30 minutes. After traction, lumbar backwards flexion manipulation and rotating manipulation were respectively adopted in treatment group and control group (on alternate days one time, 3 times as a course of treatment). The symptoms and signs (including back pain and discomfort, lower limb pain and numbness, powerless urination and defecation, numbness in perineum, straight-leg raising degree, ability of lower extremity walking, work and live) of patients were observed after treatment.
RESULTSAll the patients were followed up from 1 to 6 months with an average of 3.2 months. After treatment, the symptoms and signs of patients have markedly improved (P < 0.01), but the lower back pain and discomfort, lower limb walking ability in treatment group were better than control group (P < 0.05). According therapeutic criteria, the effect of treatment group was better than of control group (P < 0.01). In cases with bulging type, 47 in treatment group and 45 in control group, the effect of treatment group was better than of control group (P < 0.05); in cases with hernia type, 35 in treatment group and 34 in control group, there was no significantly difference in effect between two groups (P > 0.05); in cases of free type, 25 in treatment group and 23 in control group, there was no significantly difference in effect between two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONThe global effect of lumbar backwards flexion manipulation was satisfactory than rotating manipulation for treating lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. But rotating manipulation suited to free type.