Abnormal Imaging Findings of the Breast Related to Hormone Replacement Therapy: Analysis of Surgically Excised Cases.
10.3348/jkrs.2004.50.1.65
- Author:
Woo Kyung MOON
1
;
Hyung Seok KIM
;
Joo Hee CHA
;
Kyung Soo CHO
;
Eun Wan CHOI
;
Yu Jin LEE
;
Sun Yang CHUNG
;
Nariya CHO
;
Jung Gi IM
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, SNUMRC, Korea. moonwk@radcom.snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Case Report
- Keywords:
Breast neoplasms;
Breast radiography;
Breast neoplasms, US;
Hormones
- MeSH:
Breast Neoplasms;
Breast*;
Female;
Fibroadenoma;
Hormone Replacement Therapy*;
Humans;
Mammography;
Retrospective Studies;
Ultrasonography
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
2004;50(1):65-71
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To correlate the mammographic and ultrasonographic findings with the pathologic results in women undergoing hormone replacement therapy (HRT), and to determine the characteristic clinical, mammographic or histologic findings of breast cancer in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five breast lesions in 25 patients aged 44-65 (mean, 55.5) years undergoing HRT were surgically removed due to abnormal mammographic findings or the presence of palpable masses. Mammograms in all patients and ultrasonograms in 23 were retrospectively analyzed in terms of the shape and margin of the mass, and microcalcifications, and the imaging findings were correlated with the pathologic results. As a control group, 45 cancer patients not undergoing HRT were selected. Using the student t test, detection methods, tumor size, mammographic findings, and the proportion of intraductal cancers were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Surgical excision revealed ten benign lesions (four fibroadenomas and six cases of fibrocystic change) and 15 cancers (three intraductal and twelve invasive ductal cancers). Abnormal findings at mammography were a mass in 16 cases, clustered microcalcifications in seven, and a mass with microcalcifications in two. Mammography showed that all four circumscribed masses were benign. Five of seven ill-defined masses (71%) and all six spiculated masses were malignant. Three of seven cases (43%) with microcalcification, and both with a mass and microcalcification, were malignant. In two cases in which ultrasonography revealed cystic lesions, histologic examination showed that fibrocystic change had occurred. Compared to non-HRT-related cancers, HRT-related cancers were more often detected by mammography (60% vs 16%; p <0.001), smaller (17 mm vs 24 mm, p <0.01), showed microcalcification only (20% vs 13%; p <0.05), and were intraductal (20% vs 7%; p <0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients with HRT, mammographic findings of an ill-defined or spiculated mass, or one with microcalcifications, were associated with breast cancer. Compared to non-HRT-related cancers, breast cancers in patients undergoing HRT tend to manifest more frequently as a mammographic abnormality, and to be intraductal.
