A Comparative Study on the Doses of Epinephrine Causing Arrhythmia during Enflurane and Halothane Anesthesia .
10.4097/kjae.1979.12.4.321
- Author:
II Yong KWAK
1
;
Seong Deok KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Comparative Study ; Original Article
- MeSH:
Anesthesia*;
Anesthetics, Inhalation;
Animals;
Arrhythmias, Cardiac*;
Arterial Pressure;
Chloroform;
Dogs;
Enflurane*;
Epinephrine*;
Halothane*;
Humans;
Infusions, Intravenous;
Isoflurane;
Male;
Myocardium;
Trichloroethylene;
Ventricular Fibrillation;
Ventricular Premature Complexes
- From:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
1979;12(4):321-324
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
While halothane, cyclopropane, chloroform and trichloroethylene have been clearly implicated to sensitize the myocardum and increase the risk of ventricular fibrillation, newer inhalation anesthetics have shown relatively less arrhythmogenecity. Isoflurane has been suggested to be compatible with epinephrine, while controversial data suggest enflurane, an isomer of isoflurane, may or may not sensitize the myocardium, which is to be clarified by the authors study. By constant intravenous infusion using VIP pump at the rate of 2.5ug/kg/min, the dosage of epinephrine causing premature ventricular contractions was measured in ten male mongrel dogs during halothane and enflurane anesthesia. While premature ventricular contractions were observed in all dogs anesthetized with halothane, the cardiac arrhythythmia was seen in only two dogs anesthetized with enflurane. Epinephrine dosage causing premature ventricular contractions and the resultant increase in mean arterial pressure at which arrhythmias occurred were significantly higher(p< 0. 05) during enflurane anesthesia than durinh halothane anesthesiae. These results suggest that enflurane, in comparison with halothane, is relatively less arrhythmogenic.
