Management of Split Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: Comparison of Four Different Dressing Materials.
- Author:
Nu Ga RHEE
1
;
Sung Phil CHUNG
;
Tae Sik HWANG
;
Myung Ha SHIN
;
Chang Won JEON
;
Tae Soo KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Skin transplantation;
Transplant donor site;
Occlusive dressings
- MeSH:
Bandages;
Burns;
Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium;
Humans;
Incidence;
Occlusive Dressings;
Prospective Studies;
Skin;
Skin Transplantation;
Tissue Donors;
Transplant Donor Site;
Transplants
- From:Journal of Korean Burn Society
2012;15(1):34-38
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Split thickness skin graft is a frequently used reconstructive technique in burn wound, but the ideal dressing material of the donor site is yet to be developed. The donor sites have been managed with various dressing materials. The aim of this study is to compare four different dressing materials for management of the donor site in a prospective trial. METHODS: This study is based on 85 patients who had undergone split thickness skin graft from September 2011 to February 2012. The grafts harvested with a same manner and the donor sites were managed with one of the four dressing materials: Aquacel Ag(R), Mepitel(R), Bactigra(R), Op-Site(R). We compared post-operative pain scale, the time required epithelialization, ease of application, post-operative infection and number of dressings. RESULTS: Aquacel Ag(R) was the more painless dressing materials in post-operative day 1, 4, 7, 10 than Mepitel(R), Bactigra(R), Op-Site(R). Number of dressings was more lower for Aquacel Ag(R) with Mepitel(R). Ease of application was more higher for Aquacel Ag(R) with Mepitel(R). But Aquacel Ag(R) was not earliest epithelialization. The incidence of infection was not low in Aquacel Ag(R). CONCLUSION: Aquacel Ag(R) dressing is better than other dressing materials for split thickness skin graft donor site in the number of dressings, ease of application, post-operative pain.
