Long-term Surgical Outcomes of the Multi-purpose Conical Porous Synthetic Orbital Implant.
10.3341/kjo.2015.29.5.294
- Author:
Min Ji KANG
1
;
Su Kyung JUNG
;
Won Kyung CHO
;
Ji Sun PAIK
;
Suk Woo YANG
Author Information
1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. yswoph@catholic.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Eye enucleation;
Eye evisceration;
Orbital implants;
Prosthesis implantation
- MeSH:
Adult;
Eye Diseases/*surgery;
*Eye Enucleation;
*Eye Evisceration;
Female;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Incidence;
Male;
Middle Aged;
*Orbital Implants;
Postoperative Complications/*epidemiology;
Prosthesis Implantation/*methods;
Republic of Korea/epidemiology;
Retrospective Studies;
Time Factors;
Treatment Outcome
- From:Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
2015;29(5):294-300
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We present clinical results of the use of the multipurpose conical porous synthetic orbital implant (MCOI) in surgical procedures of evisceration, enucleation, and secondary enucleation in ophthalmology patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 59 eyes in which conical implants were used, including 36 cases of eviscerations, 11 enucleations, and 9 secondary enucleations. In all of the cases, the follow-up period was greater than six months between 2004 and 2013. The results focus on documenting surgical findings, as well as postoperative complications among patients. RESULTS: Superior sulcus deformities were found in six eyes (10.2% of conical implant patients), and two eyes received additional surgical interventions to correct the deformities (3.4%). Blepharoptosis was found in four eyes (6.8%), two of which received upper eyelid blepharoplasty (3.4%). Fornix shortening was reported in only one eye (1.7%). Forty-one eyes had a satisfactory cosmetic appearance after the final prosthetic fitting of conical implants (69.5%). The most frequent postoperative complication was orbital implant exposure, which seemed to occur when the preoperative status of the conjunctiva, Tenon's capsule, and sclera preservation were poor in the eyes of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: There was a lower incidence of blepharoptosis and fornix shortening with the MCOI in comparison to spherical implants, while the incidence of orbital implant exposure was similar with the MCOI in comparison to other types of orbital implants. In addition, the MCOI may have advantages with respect to postoperative cosmetic outcomes.
