Is the Angiodysplasia Significant as the Cause of Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure?.
- Author:
Kyoung Soon JIN
1
;
Hyo Geun JEUN
;
Yun A LEE
;
Jung Gon KIM
;
Uk Soon JANG
;
Hee Juang RYU
;
Jeong Woo PARK
;
Hyun Hee LEE
;
Woo Kyung CHUNG
;
Joon Seung LEE
Author Information
1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon Medical School, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea. joonseung@gilhospital.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Chronic renal failure;
Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage;
Peptic ulcer;
Angiodysplasia
- MeSH:
Angiodysplasia*;
Blood Transfusion;
Creatinine;
Dialysis;
Duodenal Ulcer;
Gastritis;
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage*;
Helicobacter pylori;
Hematemesis;
Hematocrit;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Kidney Failure, Chronic*;
Kidney Transplantation;
Length of Stay;
Male;
Melena;
Mortality;
Peptic Ulcer;
Prevalence;
Stomach Ulcer
- From:Korean Journal of Nephrology
2005;24(6):941-950
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The role of angiodysplasia as a main cause of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGH) in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) is controversial. We investigated the sources of UGH and the clinical characteristics of UGH in patients with CRF. METHODS: We reviewed the medical and endoscopic records of 574 patients who were admitted to Gil Medical Center from November 1999 to November 2004. UGH was defined as hematemesis, or nasogastric aspirate showing fresh or old blood, or melena associated with acute drop in hematocrit. CRF was defined as a serum creatinine clearance < or =59 mL/min for at least 3 months before and after the bleeding episode or the patients who have undergone dialysis or received renal transplantation. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 574 patients were CRF group. 19 of the CRF patients have received dialysis (18 paitents-hemodialysis; 1 patient-peritoneal dialysis). The mean age of CRF group was 56+/-13.65 years old and 16 patients were male. The causes of UGH in CRF patients, in order of frequency, was duodenal ulcer (37.5%), gastric ulcer (34.4%), unknown (12.5%). No angiodyplasia was found in CRF group. The sources of bleeding did not differ significantly between the two groups. The prevalence of taking ulcerogenic drugs in CRF patients was higher than that in control group (59.4% vs 29.7%, p=0.001). The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in CRF patients with peptic ulcer and gastritis was lower than that in control group (16.7% vs 42.3%, p=0.017). The mean length of hospital stay and the mean numbers of blood transfusions required were higher in the CRF group than control group. However, no differences were seen between the two groups in mortality, recurrent bleeding and surgery for control of bleeding. CONCLUSION: The common cause of UGH in patients with CRF was peptic ulcer disease and no angiodysplasia was found.
