National-Wide Survey on Endotracheal Suctioning in High-Risk Infants.
- Author:
Youngmee AHN
1
Author Information
1. Eapartment of Nursing, Inha University, Korea. aym@inha.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Neonate;
High-risk infant;
Endotracheal suctioning
- MeSH:
Adult;
Anoxia;
Bradycardia;
Catheters;
Clinical Protocols;
Growth and Development;
Head;
Humans;
Infant*;
Infant, Newborn;
Intracranial Pressure;
Lung;
Neonatal Nursing;
Nursing;
Oxygen;
Respiration;
Suction*;
Ventilators, Mechanical;
Child Health
- From:Korean Journal of Child Health Nursing
1999;5(2):198-210
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The goal of respiratory management in high risk infants is to maintain proper oxygenation by supporting respiration, therefore to minimize the secondary complications and to promote the maximum growth and development. While on artificial ventilator to achieve this goal, the infants require endotracheal suctioning(ETS) to remove lung secretions. however, the negative effects of ETS in neoates have been documented and include hypoxia, bradycardia, mucosal damage, increased intracranial pressure, and death result. The purpose of the study was to investigate how ETS is currently performed in NICU, which would be beneficial to develop the standardized ETS protocol and to apply it to these population. A national-wide survey on clinical protocol of ETS was performed to 149 neonatal nurses with the average of 3 years and 6 months experience in neonatal nursing, 34.2% of whom was bachelor in nursing. The results showed that about 89% of the nurses initiate ETS primarily based on the need of the subjects. The aseptic regulation on ETS was used in 83.9% of the subjects. There was no regulation on the length of catheter in 32.9% and on ID/OD ratio in 17.4%. Many nurses administered hyperoygenation/hyperinflation/hyperventilation based on personal knowhow, rather than scientific rationals(77.2%, 40.9%, 75.2%, retrospectively). About 41% of the nurse regulate subjectively the suction power, while 73.8% of them rotate the subject's head during suctioning and the half of the nurses was favorable in adapting the closed-suctioning protocol. With the findings of the study, the current clinical application of ETS in neonates appears to be based on adult care practices, or personal preference, rather than scientific validation of the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. This study support the needs for developing and applying the standardized ETS protocolin conjunction with the consideration given to the physiologic characteristics of the neonates in respiratory distress.
