Treatment of Hepatolithiasis according to Location.
- Author:
Young Ki PARK
1
;
Jung Chul KIM
;
Chol Kyoon CHO
;
Hyun Jong KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Chonnam University Medical School.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Hepatolithiasis;
Treatment;
Location
- MeSH:
Humans;
Incidence;
Jeollanam-do;
Liver;
Mastectomy, Segmental;
Mortality;
Postoperative Complications;
Retrospective Studies;
Wounds and Injuries
- From:Korean Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2000;4(2):107-114
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: It is difficult to treat patients with hepatolithiasis because of recurrent or residual stones and serious postoperative complications. This study was done to compare the operation method and postoperative progression related to location of the hepatolithiasis. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was done in 234 patients who underwent operation due to hepatolithiasis from Jan. 1989 to Dec. 1998 in Chonnam University Hospital. RESULTS: The patients with left intrahepatic duct stones were 135, with right intrahepatic duct stones were 30 and with both intrahepatic duct stones were 69. In cases of resection of the liver, left lobectomy, left lateral segmentectomy, right posterior segmentectomy or right lobectomy was done. In a patient with stone in caudate lobe, caudate lobectomy was done. In non-resected group choledocholithotomy was done. Of 135 patients with left intrahepatic stones, 117 patients(86.7%) underwent hepatic resection and 18 patients(13.3%) underwent choledocholithotomy. Of 30 patients with right intrahepatic stones, 6 patients(20.0%) underwent hepatic resection and 24 patients(80.0%) underwent choledocholithotomy. Of 69 patients with both intrahepatic stones, 36 patients(52.2%) underwent resection and 33 patients(47.8%) underwent choledcholithotomy. Overall incidence of remnant stone was 28.2%. In resected group of left intrahepatic stones, the incidence of remnant stones was 8.5% and in non-resected group 33.3%. In resected group of right intrahepatic stones, the incidence of remnant stones was 0% and in non-resected group 37.5%. In resected group of both intrahepatic stones, the incidence of remnant stones was 55.6% and in non-resected group 63.6%. Incidence of postopertive complications was 22.6% and wound complication was most common. There was no postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis confined to one lobe has an advantage of low incidence of remnant stone without increasing the morbidity and mortality rate. In both intrahepatic stones, the treatment is difficult, but if operation is performed with proper selection of extent of hepatic resection, favorable result would be expected.
