- Author:
Tae Oh KIM
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords: Subepithelial lesion; Subepithelial tumor; Colorectum
- MeSH: Biopsy; Biopsy, Fine-Needle; Diagnosis; Diagnosis, Differential; Endoscopy; Endosonography; Mass Screening; Mucous Membrane; Prognosis
- From:Clinical Endoscopy 2015;48(4):302-307
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: Most of subepithelial lesion (SEL) being identified was accidentally discovered as small bulging lesion covered with normal mucosa from endoscopic screening. The type of treatment and prognosis vary depending on the type of tumor, it would be crucial to perform an accurate differential diagnosis. Since the differentiation of SEL relied on the indirect findings observed from the mucosal surface using an endoscopy only in the past, it was able to confirm the presence of lesion only but difficult to identify complex detailed nature of the lesion. However, after the endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was introduced, it became possible to identify extrinsic compression, and size of intramural tumors, internal properties and contour so that it gets possible to have differential diagnosis of lesions and prediction on the lesion whether it is malignant or benign. In addition, the use of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration and EUS-guided core biopsy made it possible to make histological differential diagnosis. This study intended to investigate endoscopic and EUS findings, histological diagnosis, treatment regimen and impression of colorectal SELs.