Dosimetric Characteristics of Edge Detector(TM) in Small Beam Dosimetry.
- Author:
Kyung Hwan CHANG
1
;
Bo Ram LEE
;
You Hyun KIM
;
Kyoung Sik CHOI
;
Jung Seok LEE
;
Byung Moon PARK
;
Yong Ki BAE
;
Semie HONG
;
Jeong Woo LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Radiologic Science, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. kyhyun@korea.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Edge detector;
Small beam;
Penumbra
- MeSH:
Dependency (Psychology)
- From:Korean Journal of Medical Physics
2009;20(4):191-198
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
In this study, we evaluated an edge detector for small-beam dosimetry. We measured the dose linearity, dose rate dependence, output factor, beam profiles, and percentage depth dose using an edge detector (Model 1118 Edge) for 6-MV photon beams at different field sizes and depths. The obtained values were compared with those obtained using a standard volume ionization chamber (CC13) and photon diode detector (PFD). The dose linearity results for the three detectors showed good agreement within 1%. The edge detector had the best linearity of +/-0.08%. The edge detector and PFD showed little dose rate dependency throughout the range of 100~600 MU/min, while CC13 showed a significant discrepancy of approximately -5% at 100 MU/min. The output factors of the three detectors showed good agreement within 1% for the tested field sizes. However, the output factor of CC13 compared to the other two detectors had a maximum difference of 21% for small field sizes (~4x4 cm2). When analyzing the 20~80% penumbra, the penumbra measured using CC13 was approximately two times wider than that using the edge detector for all field sizes. The width measured using PFD was approximately 30% wider for all field sizes. Compared to the edge detector, the 10~90% penumbras measured using the CC13 and PFD were approximately 55% and 19% wider, respectively. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the edge detector was close to the real field size, while the other two detectors measured values that were 8~10% greater for all field sizes. Percentage depth doses measured by the three detectors corresponded to each other for small beams. Based on the results, we consider the edge detector as an appropriate small-beam detector, while CC13 and PFD can lead to some errors when used for small beam fields under 4x4 cm2.
