The Difference of Lung Cancer Prevalence According to Smoking Habits.
10.4046/trd.2003.55.3.267
- Author:
Moo Suk PARK
1
;
Jae Ho CHUNG
;
Jae Hee JUNG
;
Young Sam KIM
;
Se Kyu KIM
;
Sun Ha JEE
;
Joon CHANG
;
Sung Kyu KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. skkimpul@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Smoking habits;
Lung cancer
- MeSH:
Adenocarcinoma;
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell;
Epidemiologic Studies;
Female;
Humans;
Inhalation;
Logistic Models;
Lung Neoplasms*;
Lung*;
Male;
Nicotine;
Odds Ratio;
Prevalence*;
Surveys and Questionnaires;
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma;
Smoke*;
Smoking*;
Tobacco Products
- From:Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
2003;55(3):267-279
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the smoking habits in patients with lung cancer and identify any difference of prevalence according to histologic types of lung cancer. METHODS: The data were calculated by total amounts of tar and nicotine inhaled during the whole lifetime according to variation of smoking habits. This study was to investigated any difference of prevalence in lung cancer according to smoking habits. The subjects comprised 150 lung cancer cases and 300 hospital control cases that were matched by age and sex. Smoking habits during the whole lifetime were surveyed by standardized questionnaire. Odds ratios were estimated by unconditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 104 male and 34 female lung cancer cases. By histologic type, there were 53 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 67 of adenocarcinoma and 30 of small cell lung carcinoma. The differences between lung cancer cases and controls according to smoking habits were total duration of smoking, total pack years of smoking and number of cigarettes smoked per day during the previous two years. The odds ratios were higher in Kreyberg I, but not in Kreyberg II, for the longer duration of smoking, the greater total pack years of cigarettes consumed, the more cigarettes smoked per day during the previous two years, the longer duration of non-filter smoking, the earlier life cases who began to smoke, and the higher amounts of calculated total tar and nicotine inhaled over the whole lifetime. When we added grade of inhalation to calculation of amounts of tar and nicotine inhaled over the lifetime, the odds ratios of total inhalation amounts of tar and nicotine were as high as those the without them. CONCLUSIONS: This study reconfirmed that smoking habits were strongly associated with lung cancer and that there were different associations between smoking habits and histologic types of lung cancer. In particular, calculations of total tar and nicotine amounts inhaled over the whole lifetime were calculated for the first time in trials from lung cancer epidemiologic studies.
