The Efficacy of the Moisturizer APDDR-1001 for Post-laser Wound Care.
- Author:
Myoung Shin KIM
1
;
Sik HAW
;
Hyung Min LEE
;
Jeong Hwan KIM
;
Yeon Su JEONG
;
Hong Ju SHIN
;
Chong Hyun WON
;
Sung Eun CHANG
;
Mi Woo LEE
;
Jee Ho CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Dermatology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. csesnumd@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Fractional laser;
Moisturizer;
Wound care;
Wound healing
- MeSH:
Cosmetics;
Edema;
Erythema;
Humans;
Laser Therapy;
Pruritus;
Re-Epithelialization;
Research Personnel;
Treatment Outcome;
Wound Healing
- From:Korean Journal of Dermatology
2012;50(12):1017-1026
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Because cosmetic laser treatments are getting popular, post-laser wound care becomes more important. Currently, topical moisturizers are reported to be sufficient to accelerate re-epithelialization and reduce downtime in post-laser wound care. OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to evaluate the effects of the moisturizer APDDR-1001 for post-laser wound care, after ablative fractional laser on the face. METHODS: In this double-blind, split-face study, 41 patients with photo-aged face received ablative fractional laser. They were divided into two groups, APDDR-1001 and vehicle (group 1) or control moisturizer (group 2), which were applied to the opposite sides of the face for 1 week after the laser treatment. The treatment efficacy was evaluated by the transepidermal water loss (TEWL), erythema index, investigator's assessment for recovery in erythema and overall improvement of the wound. Subjects ranked irritating symptoms and overall satisfaction ratings in the overall improvement. RESULTS: APDDR-1001 was well-tolerated and showed improvement in the erythema index and TEWL during the 7 days of treatment. In group 2, improvement in erythema graded by investigators was significantly higher for APDDR-1001 on day 3 (p<0.05). The overall improvement of wound ranked by investigators was significantly higher for APDDR-1001, compared with the controls in both groups. Subjective assessment demonstrated significantly less erythema (p=0.043), edema (p=0.041) and overall satisfaction ratings in the overall improvement (p<0.048) with APDDR-1001; however, no differences were detected in pain and edema between APDDR-1001 and vehicle (group 1). In group 2, subjects ranked 'much or very much improved' in 75 % of APDDR-1001 side and 55% of control moisturizer side. No significant differences in erythema, edema, pain and itching were reported between APDDR-1001 and control moisturizer in group 2. CONCLUSION: The moisturizer APDDR-1001 demonstrated effective improvements in wound healing and subjective symptoms after ablative fractional laser therapy.
