Relationship between Eating Style and Food Intake of Healthy Female College Students during Chuseok Holidays.
10.5720/kjcn.2016.21.2.131
- Author:
Seok Young KIM
1
Author Information
1. Department of Food and Nutrition, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea. sykim@gnu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
eating behavior;
restrained eating;
dutch eating behavior questionnaire;
holiday;
food intake
- MeSH:
Anthropometry;
Eating*;
Energy Intake;
Feeding Behavior;
Female*;
Hip;
Holidays*;
Humans
- From:Korean Journal of Community Nutrition
2016;21(2):131-139
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to investigate associations between eating style and food intake of 45 female college students during Chuseok holidays. METHODS: A ten-day food record was obtained and divided into two parts. The first five days (September 20-24, 2015) were considered as a 'Normal Day (ND 1-5)' and the subsequent five days (September 25-29) as 'Holiday (HD6-10)'. The middle three days (September 26-28) of the holidays were considered as the 'Peak Holiday (PD7-9)'. Eating behaviors were measured using the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) and anthropometry was assessed in all study participants. Participants were grouped by cluster analysis according to the mean energy intake of the first three days of the Holiday. RESULTS: Participants had a low-normal range of BMI and they were carefully restricting their food intake at Normal Day. Even the food intake did not exceed 2000 kcal per day during the Peak Holiday. External eating was the most prevalent type of eating behavior, followed by restrained eating and emotional eating. Normal energy and fat intake were correlated with the external eating subscale of the DEBQ. Restrained eating was associated with the weight, BMI, fat mass, waist, and hip girth of the subjects. Compared to the Normal Day, they overate during the Holiday with different eating styles including 'restraint', 'disinhibition', and 'fluctuation'. Therefore, neither eating behaviors nor anthropometry was associated with food intake during the Holiday. Although eating behaviors and anthropometric measures were not different among eating style clusters, the food intakes of disinhibition cluster were higher than those of restraint cluster during all the study periods. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects can be classified with the restraint, disinhibition, and fluctuation clusters. However, eating behaviors and anthropometry were not different among three clusters.
