Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance: Comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal Class III malocclusion.
10.4041/kjod.2017.47.3.167
- Author:
Yun Jin KOO
1
;
Sung Hwan CHOI
;
Byeong Tak KEUM
;
Hyung Seog YU
;
Chung Ju HWANG
;
Birte MELSEN
;
Kee Joon LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Centers of resistance;
Maxillomandibular basal arch width differences;
Class III malocclusion;
Computed tomography
- MeSH:
Crowns;
Dental Arch;
Humans;
Malocclusion*;
Tooth
- From:The Korean Journal of Orthodontics
2017;47(3):167-175
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences in maxillomandibular transverse measurements at either the crown or the estimated center of resistance (CR), and to compare values between normal occlusion and Class III malocclusion groups. METHODS: Dental casts and computed tomography (CT) data from 30 individuals with normal occlusion and 30 with skeletal Class III malocclusions were evaluated. Using the casts, dental arch widths (DAWs) were measured from the cusp tips, and basal arch widths (BAWs-cast) were measured as the distance between the points at the mucogingival junction adjacent to the respective cusp tips. The BAWs determined from CT (BAWs-CT) images were measured from the estimated CRs of the teeth. RESULTS: None of the DAW measurements or maxillomandibular DAW differences showed statistically significant intergroup differences. In contrast, the maxillary BAWs-CT and BAWs-cast were lesser in the Class III malocclusion group than in the normal occlusion group. The mandibular BAWs-CT were significantly greater in the Class III malocclusion group than in the normal occlusion group. Moreover, the maxillomandibular BAW differences on both CT and cast showed significant intergroup differences in all transverse measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The maxillomandibular DAW differences showed no significant intergroup differences. In contrast, the maxillomandibular BAW differences on both CT and cast showed significant intergroup differences in all transverse measurements. The maxillomandibular BAW differences at the estimated CRs, measured using CT or casts, can reveal underlying transverse maxillary basal arch deficiencies in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusions.
