Radiographic Study of Peri-Implant Bone Loss and Its Relationship to the Morphology on Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Ridge.
- Author:
Jun Hee LEE
1
;
Jong Rak HONG
;
Chang Soo KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Rep. of Korea. oralsurgery@naver.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Anterior maxilla;
Peri-implant;
Bone loss;
Bone resorption;
Morphology;
Cawood and Howell's classification
- MeSH:
Alveolar Process*;
Bone Resorption;
Humans;
Tooth
- From:Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
2006;32(6):575-579
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate peri-implant bone loss and implant success on anterior maxillary alveolar ridges and Compare Class III and Class IV ridges in the aspect of peri-implant bone loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 14 patients (aged 21 to 68, 6males and 8females), who lacked maxillary anterior teeth and were installed from January 2000 to April 2003 at Samsung Medical Center, were selected. The type of implant used included 30 Branemark implant. They were taken with digital tomographic and conventional intraoral radiographic examinmation, and were treated with implant installaion without bone augmentation. The peri-implant bone resorption was measured at the mesial and distal aspect of implant on the conventional intraoral radiographs. RESULTS: The study classified the anterior maxillary alveolar ridge and measured peri-implant bone resorption from the period of implant installation to the 2nd year after functional loading radiographically. The study revealed no statistically significant difference between two groups, which was classified by its morphology. The average bone resorption on healing period before loading was 0.18mm and 0.18mm, the 1st year of loading period, 0.77 mm and 0.84mm, and on the 2nd year of loading period, 0.07mm and 0.06mm, respectively on both Class III and class IV. CONCLUSION: In the knife edge form of anterior maxillary residual ridges(Class IV), implant placement without ridge augmentation does not have significant difference with that of Class III alveolar ridge in the concern of Implant success after 2 year functional loading period in the aspect of peri-implant bone resorption radiographically.
