Researcher and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages, and Limitations.
10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1749
- Author:
Armen Yuri GASPARYAN
1
;
Bekaidar NURMASHEV
;
Marlen YESSIRKEPOV
;
Dmitry A ENDOVITSKIY
;
Alexander A VORONOV
;
George D KITAS
Author Information
1. Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, West Midlands, UK. a.gasparyan@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Bibliography as Topic;
Performance;
Profile;
Researcher;
Author;
Scholarly Journal;
Information Retrieval
- MeSH:
Awards and Prizes;
Bibliography as Topic;
Databases, Bibliographic;
Humans;
Information Storage and Retrieval;
Internet;
Research Personnel
- From:Journal of Korean Medical Science
2017;32(11):1749-1756
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Currently available online profiling platforms offer various services for researchers and authors. Opening an individual account and filling it with scholarly contents increase visibility of research output and boost its impact. This article overviews some of the widely used and emerging profiling platforms, highlighting their tools for sharing scholarly items, crediting individuals, and facilitating networking. Global bibliographic databases and search platforms, such as Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar, are widely used for profiling authors with indexed publications. Scholarly networking websites, such as ResearchGate and Academia.edu, provide indispensable services for researchers poorly visible elsewhere on the Internet. Several specialized platforms are designed to offer profiling along with their main functionalities, such as reference management and archiving. The Open Researcher and Contributor Identification (ORCID) project has offered a solution to the author name disambiguation. It has been integrated with numerous bibliographic databases, platforms, and manuscript submission systems to help research managers and journal editors select and credit the best reviewers, and other scholarly contributors. Individuals with verifiable reviewer and editorial accomplishments are also covered by Publons, which is an increasingly recognized service for publicizing and awarding reviewer comments. Currently available profiling formats have numerous advantages and some limitations. The advantages are related to their openness and chances of boosting the researcher impact. Some of the profiling websites are complementary to each other. The underutilization of various profiling websites and their inappropriate uses for promotion of ‘predatory’ journals are among reported limitations. A combined approach to the profiling systems is advocated in this article.
