Comparison of the bone healing capacity of autogenous bone, demineralized freeze dried bone allograft, and collagen sponge in repairing rabbit cranial defects.
10.5125/jkaoms.2012.38.4.221
- Author:
Jung Woo HUR
1
;
Suk Ja YOON
;
Sun Youl RYU
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea. ryu-suny@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Demineralized freeze dried bone allograft;
Collagen sponge;
Computed tomography number
- MeSH:
Bone Density;
Bone Regeneration;
Collagen;
Durapatite;
Inflammation;
Osteogenesis;
Porifera;
Rabbits;
Transplantation, Homologous;
Transplants
- From:Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
2012;38(4):221-230
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of collagen graft materials, as compared to other graft materials, for use in healing calvarial defects in rabbits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten mm diameter calvarial defects were made in ten rabbits. The rabbits were then divided into 4 groups: control, autogenous bone graft, SureOss graft, and Teruplug graft. Bone regeneration was evaluated using histological and radiographic methods. RESULTS: Based on visual examination, no distinct healing profile was observed. At 4 weeks after treatment, histological analysis showed there was no bone regeneration in the control group; however, at 8 weeks after treatment, new bone formation was observed around the margin of the defective sites. In the autogenous bone graft group, new bone formation was observed at 4 weeks after treatment and mature bone was detected around the grafted bone after 8 weeks. In the SureOss graft group, at 4 weeks after treatment, acute inflammatory and multinuclear cells were noted around the grafted materials; at 8 weeks after treatment, a decrease in graft materials coupled with new bone formation were observed at the defective sites. In the Teruplug graft group, new bone formation was detected surrounding the bone margin and without signs of inflammation. There were statistically significant differences observed between the graft and control group in terms of bone density as evidenced by radiographic analysis using computed tomography (P<0.05), particularly for the autogenous bone graft group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: These results suggested that autogenous bone, SureOss and Teruplug have the ability to induce bone regeneration as compared to an untreated control group. The osteogenic potential of Teruplug was observed to be lower than that of autogenous bone, but similar to that of SureOss.
