Relation between Pulse Wave Velocity, Left Ventricular Diastolic Function, and Circadian Variation of Blood Pressure in Patients with Never Treated Essential Hypertension.
10.4070/kcj.2004.34.11.1099
- Author:
Woo Hyuk SONG
1
;
Jeong Cheon AHN
;
Jin Won KIM
;
Seung Woon RHA
;
Hee Nam PARK
;
Do Sun LIM
;
Young Hoon KIM
;
Wan Joo SHIM
;
Chang Gyu PARK
;
Hong Seok SEO
;
Dong Joo OH
;
Young Moo RHO
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. hhansin@korea.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Hypertension;
Cardiac function tests
- MeSH:
Blood Pressure*;
Deceleration;
Echocardiography;
Echocardiography, Doppler;
Heart Function Tests;
Humans;
Hypertension*;
Male;
Pulse Wave Analysis*;
Vascular Stiffness
- From:Korean Circulation Journal
2004;34(11):1099-1106
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: An increased pulse wave velocity (PWV) and a non-dipping pattern in hypertensive patients have been shown to be associated with an excess of target organ damage. The relationship between the PWV and circadian variation of blood pressure (BP) (dipper or nondipper) were sought, and also the LV diastolic function between dipper and nondipper patients compared. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 44 hypertensive subjects, who had never been treated, were enrolled (mean age: 48+/-12 yrs, men: 29). The following procedures were undertaken. 1) 24 hour ambulatory BP monitoring; 2) echocardiography for LV geometry, LV mass index (LVMI), LV systolic and diastolic functions, including tissue Doppler and aortic PWV. The patients were divided into two groups with respect to their ambulatory BP profiles, i.e., dipper and nondipper. The PWV, LV geometry and diastolic functions were compared between dipper and nondipper patients, and the relationship between the PWV and diastolic function analyzed in all patients. RESULTS: Twenty (45%) were nondipper patients. There were no significant differences in the LV geometry, LVMI and PWV between dipper and nondipper patients (PWV; 8.8+/-3.1 vs. 8.6+/-3.3 m/sec, p>0.05). In all patients, the PWV was related to the deceleration time (r=0.34, p=0.03) and the mitral E/A (r=-0.31, p=0.02) and mitral Em/Am ratios obtained by the tissue Doppler echocardiography (r=-0.31, p=0.03). The proportion with diastolic dysfunction was higher in the nondipper than the dipper patients (21 vs. 50%, p<0.01). There was a significant relation between the PWV and Em (r=-0.45, p=0.047) in the nondipper, but not in the dipper. CONCLUSION: Prolonged exposure to high BP (nondipper) was not related with increased aortic stiffness in never treated hypertensive patients. The PWV was closely related with LV diastolic dysfunction in nondipper patients.
