Preservation of Motion at the Surgical Level after Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.
10.3340/jkns.2015.0909.006
- Author:
Young Seok LEE
1
;
Young Baeg KIM
;
Seung Won PARK
;
Dong Ho KANG
Author Information
1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy;
Motion change;
Motion preservation;
Disc height
- MeSH:
Foraminotomy*;
Humans;
Neck;
Radiography;
Surgeons;
Zygapophyseal Joint
- From:Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
2017;60(4):433-440
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: Although minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) is an established approach for motion preservation, the outcomes are variable among patients. The objective of this study was to identify significant factors that influence motion preservation after MI-PCF. METHODS: Forty-eight patients who had undergone MI-PCF between 2004 and 2012 on a total of 70 levels were studied. Cervical parameters measured using plain radiography included C2–7 plumb line, C2–7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, thoracic outlet angle, neck tilt, and disc height before and 24 months after surgery. The ratios of the remaining facet joints after MI-PCF were calculated postoperatively using computed tomography. Changes in the distance between interspinous processes (DISP) and the segmental angle (SA) before and after surgery were also measured. We determined successful motion preservation with changes in DISP of ≤3 mm and in SA of ≤2°. RESULTS: The differences in preoperative and postoperative DISP and SA after MI-PCF were 0.03±3.95 mm and 0.34±4.46°, respectively, fulfilling the criteria for successful motion preservation. However, the appropriate level of motion preservation is achieved in cases in which changes in preoperative and postoperative DISP and SA motions are 55.7 and 57.1%, respectively. Based on preoperative and postoperative DISP, patients were divided into three groups, and the characteristics of each group were compared. Among these, the only statistically significant factor in motion preservation was preoperative disc height (Pearson’s correlation coefficient=0.658, p<0.001). The optimal disc height for motion preservation in regard to DISP ranges from 4.18 to 7.08 mm. CONCLUSION: MI-PCF is a widely accepted approach for motion preservation, although desirable radiographic outcomes were only achieved in approximately half of the patients who had undergone the procedure. Since disc height appears to be a significant factor in motion preservation, surgeons should consider disc height before performing MI-PCF.
