The Comparison of M-B CDI-K Short Form and K-ASQ as Screening Test for Language Development.
10.5535/arm.2016.40.6.1108
- Author:
Seong Woo KIM
1
;
Ji Yong KIM
;
Sang Yoon LEE
;
Ha Ra JEON
Author Information
1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea. snoopyhara@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Language development disorder;
Sensitivity and specificity;
Accuracy
- MeSH:
Autism Spectrum Disorder;
Cerebral Palsy;
Child;
Diagnosis;
Equipment and Supplies;
Humans;
Infant;
Language Development Disorders;
Language Development*;
Mass Screening*;
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine;
Sensitivity and Specificity
- From:Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
2016;40(6):1108-1113
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of the communication domain in the Korean version of Ages and Stages Questionnaire (K-ASQ), and short form of the Korean version of MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (M-B CDI-K), as screening tests for language developmental delay. METHODS: Data was collected between April 2010 and December 2013, from children who visited either the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation or the Developmental Delay Clinic, presenting with language development delay as their chief complaint. All the children took the short form of M-B CDI-K and K-ASQ as screening tests, and received diagnostic language assessments including Sequenced Language Scale for Infants (SELSI) or Preschool Receptive-Expressive Language Scale (PRES). RESULTS: A total of 206 children, mean age 29.7 months, were enrolled. The final diagnoses were developmental language disorder, global developmental delay, autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, etc. The M-B CDI-K short form and the communication domain of the K-ASQ had 95.9% and 76.7% sensitivity, and 82.4% and 85.3% specificity, with regards to diagnostic language assessments. The M-B CDI-K short form showed higher negative predictive value and better accuracy than the communication domain of the K-ASQ. CONCLUSION: The screening ability of K-ASQ was not sufficient for children with language development delay, and the M-B CDI-K short form should be implemented for additional screening.
