Preventable Trauma Death Rate in Daegu, South Korea.
- Author:
Sungbae MOON
1
;
Suk Hee LEE
;
Hyun Wook RYOO
;
Jong Kun KIM
;
Jae Yun AHN
;
Sung Jin KIM
;
Jae Cheon JEON
;
Kyung Woo LEE
;
Ae Jin SUNG
;
Yun Jeong KIM
;
Dae Ro LEE
;
Byung Soo DO
;
Sin Ryul PARK
;
Jin Seok LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. mycozzy@naver.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Death;
Injuries;
Outcome and process assessment
- MeSH:
Cause of Death;
Daegu*;
Emergency Service, Hospital;
Humans;
Korea*;
Logistic Models;
Mortality*;
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care);
Quality Control;
Retrospective Studies
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
2016;27(5):404-413
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This study was performed to investigate the preventable death rate (PDR) in Daegu, South Korea, and to assess both its affecting- and preventable-factors to improve the treatment of regional trauma patients. METHODS: All cases of traumatic death that occurred between January 2012 and December 2012 in five hospitals in Daegu were analyzed retrospectively by a panel review. Cases were classified into preventable (P) and non-preventable deaths (NP). We determined the affecting factors of trauma deaths and preventable factors during trauma care. RESULTS: The PDR was 25.2%. Significant differences by mode of arrival, day of injury, cause of death, and time of emergency department (ED) arrival were observed between P and NP groups. According to the logistic regression analysis, preventability was associated with patients transferred from other hospitals, ED arrival at night and dawn, and non-head injuries. A total of 145 preventable factors were discovered in 59 preventable trauma deaths. When we categorized by location, the ED was the most common, with 71 cases, followed by 57 prehospital preventable factors. When we classified the preventable factors by process, 76.8% were process-related and 23.4% were structure-related. CONCLUSION: Our study is valuable to build an adequate trauma system in Daegu as it provides the baseline quality control data. Efforts to mediate the preventable factors were revealed in this study, and continuous reviews to calculate and track the PDR are needed to evaluate the local trauma system and establish a system specific to Daegu.
