Comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical study of alveolar ridge preservation using an extracellular matrix-based dental resorbable membrane in the extraction socket.
10.5051/jpis.2017.47.3.165
- Author:
Hyeyoon CHANG
1
;
Sulhee KIM
;
Jin wook HWANG
;
Sungtae KIM
;
Ki Tae KOO
;
Tae Il KIM
;
Yang Jo SEOL
;
Yong Moo LEE
;
Young KU
;
Jong Ho LEE
;
In Chul RHYU
Author Information
1. Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea. kst72@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Randomized Controlled Trial ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Alveolar bone grafting;
Bone regeneration;
Cone-beam computed tomography;
Membranes;
Three-dimensional imaging;
Tooth socket
- MeSH:
Alveolar Bone Grafting;
Alveolar Process*;
Biocompatible Materials;
Bone and Bones;
Bone Regeneration;
Clinical Study*;
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Extracellular Matrix;
Gyeonggi-do;
Imaging, Three-Dimensional;
Membranes*;
Tooth Socket
- From:Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science
2017;47(3):165-173
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to radiographically and clinically compare the effect of extracellular matrix (ECM) membranes on dimensional alterations following a ridge preservation procedure. METHODS: One of 2 different ECM membranes was applied during a ridge preservation procedure. A widely used ECM membrane (WEM; Bio-Gide, Geistlich Biomaterials, Wolhusen, Switzerland) was applied in the treatment group and a newly developed ECM membrane (NEM; Lyso-Gide, Oscotec Inc., Seongnam, Korea) was applied in the control group. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans and alginate impressions were obtained 1 week and 6 months after the ridge preservation procedure. Results were analyzed using the independent t-test and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the ECM membranes in the changes in the dimension, width, and height of the extraction socket or the quantity of bone tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The NEM showed comparable clinical and radiographic results to the WEM following the ridge preservation procedure.
