Near-Normalized Gene Expression Profiles in Bladder With Detrusor Overactivity in Rats With Bladder Outlet Obstruction After Deobstruction.
- Author:
Tack LEE
1
;
U Sung LIM
;
Dong Hyuk KANG
;
Hae Do JUNG
;
Hyunzu KIM
;
Bo Hwa CHOI
;
Ju Hee KANG
;
Sang Min YOON
;
Chang Shin PARK
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Urethral Obstruction; Urinary Bladder, Overactive; DNA; Microarray Analysis; Gene Expression Profiling
- MeSH: Animals; DNA; Female; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression*; Humans; Microarray Analysis; Neuronal Plasticity; Rats*; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Residual Volume; RNA; Transcriptome*; Urethral Obstruction; Urinary Bladder Diseases; Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction*; Urinary Bladder*; Urinary Bladder, Overactive
- From:International Neurourology Journal 2017;21(4):247-258
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: The pathophysiological role of detrusor overactivity (DO) in the bladder, which is commonly observed in various bladder diseases, is not well understood. DO appears in bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), and may continue even after subsequent deobstruction. DO therefore provides an excellent opportunity to observe molecular biological changes. METHODS: In this study, to understand the molecular effects of persistent DO after BOO induction and deobstruction, we performed awake cystometry on female Sprague-Dawley rats divided into 4 groups: a sham group, a BOO group, a deobstructed group with DO after BOO (DDO), and a deobstructed group without DO after BOO (non-DDO). Total RNA was extracted from the bladder samples, and gene expression profiles were compared between the sham and model groups. RESULTS: DO was observed in 5 of the 6 rats (83%) in the BOO group, and in 6 of the 13 rats (46%) in the deobstructed group. The non-DDO group showed a significantly greater residual volume than the DDO group. Through a clustering analysis of gene expression profiles, we identified 7,532 common upregulated and downregulated genes, the expression of which changed by more than 2 fold. In the BOO group, 898 upregulated and 2,911 downregulated genes were identified. The non-DDO group showed 3,472 upregulated and 4,025 downregulated genes, whereas in the DDO group, only 145 and 72 genes were upregulated and downregulated, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal function and gene expression profiles in bladders after BOO were normalized in the BOO rats with DO after deobstruction, whereas in those without DO, abnormal function persisted and the gene expression profile became more abnormal. DO may play a protective role against the stress to the bladder induced by BOO and deobstruction as a form of adaptive neuroplasticity.
