Efficacy of Conization in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
- Author:
Seung Seob KEUM
1
;
Jung Pil LEE
;
Hee Sug RYU
;
Ki Hong CHANG
;
Young Han PARK
;
Jae Hyun LIM
;
Kie Suk OH
Author Information
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia;
Cone biopsy
- MeSH:
Biopsy;
Cautery;
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia*;
Cervix Uteri;
Conization*;
Diagnosis;
Female;
Follow-Up Studies;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Hysterectomy;
Incidence;
Patient Selection;
Recurrence;
Sutures
- From:Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2001;44(6):1150-1157
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of conization of the cervix in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. STUDY DESIGN: Cold-Knife conization was performed in total 436 patients from June 1994 to May 2000. Indications and complications of conization were studied. And the results of cervical cytology, cervical histology, colposcopic findings and pathologic diagnosis of conization specimens were evaluated in comparison with the pathologic diagnosis of hysterectomy specimens and follow-up check of the patients. RESULTS: Followings are results summarized. 1. Patients distribution according to cone biopsy results was 31.0% for CIS, 43.3% for CIN III, 14.7% for CIN II, 7.6% of CIN I, 3.4% for CNI, respectively. 2. The rate of agreement between colposcopy-directed biopsy and conization was 63.1%. 3. The positive rate of resection margin was 15.1%. 4. The recurrence rate in clear resection margin group was 7.0%. But there was no recurrence after hysterectomy in cases with positive resection margin of conization specimen, and the recurrence rate of positive resection margin without hysterectomy group was 10.5%. 5. The incidence of delayed hemorrhage (bleeding after 2 weeks) in hemostatic suture group and electric cauterization only group was 4.7% (13/279) and 15.6% (23/157), respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that conization of the cervix as the surgical treatment was effective in CIN patients with careful patient selection.
