Cochlear Implant Outcomes: A Comparison between Irradiated and Non-irradiated Ears.
- Author:
Jie Min SOH
1
;
Vishal Deepak D'SOUZA
;
Gopal Krishna SAREPAKA
;
Win Nie NG
;
Chun Suan ONG
;
Wong Kein LOW
Author Information
1. Department of Otolaryngology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. low.wong.kein@sgh.com.sg
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Hearing loss;
Deafness;
Cochlear implant;
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma;
Radiotherapy;
Irradiation
- MeSH:
Auditory Pathways;
Cochlear Implantation;
Cochlear Implants;
Cochlear Nerve;
Deafness;
Ear;
Head;
Hearing;
Hearing Aids;
Hearing Loss;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural;
Humans;
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms;
Neck;
Noise;
Retrospective Studies;
Speech Perception;
Surveys and Questionnaires
- From:Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology
2012;5(Suppl 1):S93-S98
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES: Radiotherapy for head and neck tumors is known to potentially induce sensorineural hearing loss, which is possibly due to damage to the cochlear and/or auditory pathways. Since the success of cochlear implantation depends on a functional auditory nerve, this paper aims to study the hearing outcomes of cochlear implantation in irradiated ears. METHODS: A retrospective study of cochlear implant recipients from our institution who had previously received radiotherapy for head and neck cancers was performed. A control group with cochlear implants who did not receive radiotherapy was recruited. A review of case records, speech discrimination scores (SDS), and a validated subjective questionnaire in the form of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) was administered to the study group who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Global and category scores in both groups were averaged and statistically compared via non-inferiority (NI) testing. RESULTS: With the control group (n=8) as the reference, the -DeltaNI was defined, and a one-tailed lower 95% confidence interval was used for the irradiated group (n=8). The APHAB degree of improvement (%) results were as follows: global, 28.9% (19.32%, -DeltaNI=16.3%); ease of communication, 67.0% (58.36%, -DeltaNI=37.5%); background noise, 53.2% (44.14%, -DeltaNI=26.8%); reverberation, 41.7% (28.85%, -DeltaNI=32.7%); and aversiveness, -46.2% (-67.80%, -DeltaNI=-56.9%). The SDS was 66.9% (56.02%, -DeltaNI=51.0%). From the results, lower 95% confidence interval limits of global APHAB, SDS, ease of communication, and background noise scores of the irradiated group were within the defined -DeltaNI boundary and hence are not inferior to the control. The categories of reverberation and aversiveness could not be proven, however. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated marked improvements in hearing measured both objectively and subjectively. The overall hearing outcomes after cochlear implantation for post-irradiated patients were not worse than patients who have had no prior irradiation to ear structures.
