Correlation between Femoral Guidewire Position and Tunnel Communication in Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
10.3349/ymj.2014.55.6.1592
- Author:
Sang Hyuk LEE
1
;
Jun Young CHOI
;
Dong Hee KIM
;
Bun Jung KANG
;
Dae Cheol NAM
;
Hong Kwon YOON
;
Sun Chul HWANG
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, Korea. hscspine@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords:
Anterior cruciate ligament;
femoral tunnel;
double bundle reconstruction
- MeSH:
Aged;
Anterior Cruciate Ligament/*anatomy & histology/surgery;
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/*methods;
*Bone Wires;
Cadaver;
Female;
Femur/*anatomy & histology/surgery;
Humans;
Knee Joint/surgery;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Tibia/*anatomy & histology/surgery;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- From:Yonsei Medical Journal
2014;55(6):1592-1599
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The object of this study was to determine the shortest possible distances of antero-medial (AM) and postero-lateral (PL) guide wire tunnel positions required to prevent femoral bone tunnel communication in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using human cadaver knees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The centers of femoral AM and PL bundles of 16 cadaveric knees were drilled with guide wires and the distances of guide wires, were measured upon entrance into the bone. Femoral tunnel drilling was performed using transportal technique. The diameters of AM and PL graft were 8 mm and 6 mm, respectively. CT scans were taken on each knee, and 3-dimensional models were constructed to identify the femoral tunnel position and to create AM and PL tunnel virtual cylinders. Thickness of the bone bridge between the two tunnels was measured. RESULTS: In four out of six specimens, in which the guide wires were placed at less than or equal to 9 mm, communication was noted. In specimens with guide wires placed at distances greater than or equal to 10 mm, communication was not noted. The two groups showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.008). In cases where the distance between the AM and PL femoral tunnel guide wires was 12 mm, the bone bridge thickness was greater than 2 mm along the tunnel. CONCLUSION: The technique for double bundle-anterior cruciate ligament (DB-ACL) reconstruction that we show here can avoid bone tunnel communication when AM and PL femoral guide wires are placed at least 10 mm apart, and 12 mm should be kept to preserve 2 mm bone bridge thickness.
