Reduction of Nasal Bone Fracture using Ultrasound Imaging during Surgery.
10.7181/acfs.2016.17.1.14
- Author:
So Min HWANG
1
;
Hao Ching PAN
;
Hong Il KIM
;
Hyung Do KIM
;
Min Kyu HWANG
;
Min Wook KIM
;
Jong Seo LEE
Author Information
1. Aesthetic, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Center, Good Moonhwa Hospital, Busan, Korea. lexusair@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Nasal bone;
Ultrasonography;
Nose
- MeSH:
Humans;
Nasal Bone*;
Nose;
Patient Satisfaction;
Prospective Studies;
Ultrasonography*
- From:Archives of Craniofacial Surgery
2016;17(1):14-19
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Most nasal bone fractures are corrected using non-invasive methods. Often, patients are dissatisfied with surgical outcomes following such closed approach. In this study, we compare surgical outcomes following blind closed reduction to that of ultrasound-guided reduction. METHODS: A single-institutional prospective study was performed for all nasal fracture patients (n=28) presenting between May 2013 and November 2013. Upon research consent, patients were randomly assigned to either the control group (n=14, blind reduction) or the experimental group (n=14, ultrasound-guided reduction). Surgical outcomes were evaluated using preoperative and 3-month postoperative X-ray images by two independent surgeons. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire survey. RESULTS: The experimental group consisted of 4 patients with Plane I fracture and 10 patients with Plane II fracture. The control group consisted of 3 patients with Plane I fracture and 11 patients with Plane II fracture. The mean surgical outcomes score and the mean patient dissatisfaction score were found not to differ between the experimental and the control group in Plane I fracture (p=0.755, 0.578, respectively). In a subgroup analysis consisting of Plane II fractures only, surgeons graded outcomes for ultrasound-guided reduction higher than that for the control group (p=0.007). Likewise, among the Plane II fracture patients, those who underwent ultrasound-guided reduction were less dissatisfied than those who underwent blind reduction (p=0.043). CONCLUSION: Our study result suggests that ultrasound-guided closed reduction is superior to blind closed reduction in those patients with Plane II nasal fractures.
