Transurethral Prostatectomy with Advanced Technique and Instruments.
- Author:
Tag Keun YOO
1
;
Seok KIM
;
Yong Taek ROH
;
Hyung Gyun KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Eul Ji Medical College, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia;
TURP
- MeSH:
Adenoma;
Catheterization;
Catheters;
Humans;
Neck Injuries;
Postoperative Complications;
Prostatic Hyperplasia;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate*;
Urinary Bladder;
Urinary Catheterization;
Urinary Catheters
- From:Korean Journal of Andrology
1999;17(2):121-125
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We studied the therapeutic effect and safety of transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) performed with improved instruments by a moderately experienced resectionist. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical data of the 95 consecutive patients who underwent TURP by one surgeon from March 1995 to June 1997 were analyzed. During this period, a continuous-irrigation 26F TUR sheath with a 30-degree lens attached to a monitor screen was used in most patients. RESULTS: The average weight of the resected adenoma was 10.8 7.4 gm, and the resection time was 47.2 21.2 minutes. The average weight of tissue resected per minute was 0.23 0.13 gm. Six patients required transfusion, and four suffered operative complications (one bladder perforation, one bladder neck injury, and two urethral injuries that enforced prolonged catheterization). Postoperative complications developed in seven cases. The duration of postoperative urethral catheterization averaged 2.8 days. The maximal flow rate was improved from 11.3 mL/sec to 20.6 mL/sec. Subjective satisfaction was mentioned by 95.6% of patients (91/95). In comparison with data from the first authors former report, all differences in terms of resection speed, safety, and morbidity were statistically significant. The therapeutic efficacy of the operation with the new equipment seems to be superior to that of other less invasive procedures, and even in terms of complications and duration of catheterization, these results are comparable to those of other procedures. CONCLUSIONS: We think that TURP deserves to be the primary treatment modality for the patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who need surgical therapy if the procedure is performed by a properly trained surgeon equipped with modern TUR instruments.
