Radiation Dose Reduction via Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction and Automatic Tube Voltage Modulation (CARE kV) in Abdominal CT.
10.3348/kjr.2013.14.6.886
- Author:
Hyun Joo SHIN
1
;
Yong Eun CHUNG
;
Young Han LEE
;
Jin Young CHOI
;
Mi Suk PARK
;
Myeong Jin KIM
;
Ki Whang KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Korea. yelv@yuhs.ac
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Computed tomography;
Radiation dose reduction;
Iterative reconstruction;
Tube voltage modulation
- MeSH:
Adult;
Aged;
Aged, 80 and over;
*Algorithms;
Equipment Design;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Middle Aged;
Multidetector Computed Tomography/adverse effects/*instrumentation;
Radiation Dosage;
Radiation Injuries/etiology/*prevention & control;
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/*methods;
Radiography, Abdominal/adverse effects/*methods;
Retrospective Studies
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology
2013;14(6):886-893
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) and automated kV modulation (CARE kV) in reducing radiation dose without increasing image noise for abdominal CT examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 77 patients who received CT imaging with an application of CARE kV with or without SAFIRE and who had comparable previous CT images obtained without CARE kV or SAFIRE, using the standard dose (i.e., reference mAs of 240) on an identical CT scanner and reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) within 1 year. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (33 patients, CT scanned with CARE kV); and group B (44 patients, scanned after reducing the reference mAs from 240 to 170 and applying both CARE kV and SAFIRE). CT number, image noise for four organs and radiation dose were compared among the two groups. RESULTS: Image noise increased after CARE kV application (p < 0.001) and significantly decreased as SAFIRE strength increased (p < 0.001). Image noise with reduced-mAs scan (170 mAs) in group B became similar to that of standard-dose FBP images after applying CARE kV and SAFIRE strengths of 3 or 4 when measured in the aorta, liver or muscle (p > or = 0.108). Effective doses decreased by 19.4% and 41.3% for groups A and B, respectively (all, p < 0.001) after application of CARE kV with or without SAFIRE. CONCLUSION: Combining CARE kV, reduction of mAs from 240 to 170 mAs and noise reduction by applying SAFIRE strength 3 or 4 reduced the radiation dose by 41.3% without increasing image noise compared with the standard-dose FBP images.
