Urinary Stones following Renal Transplantation.
- Author:
Hyang KIM
1
;
Jhoong S CHEIGH
;
Hee Won HAM
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Urinary stones (calculi);
Kidney transplantation;
Calcium oxalate;
Hyperparathyroidism
- MeSH:
Adult;
Age Distribution;
Aged;
Calculi/chemistry;
Female;
Human;
Incidence;
Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery;
Kidney Transplantation/*adverse effects/methods;
Korea/epidemiology;
Male;
Middle Age;
Prognosis;
Risk Assessment;
Sex Distribution;
Urinary Calculi/*epidemiology/etiology
- From:The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
2001;16(2):118-122
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The formation of urinary tract stones following renal transplantation is a rare complication. The clinical features of stones after transplantation differ from those of non-transplant patients. Renal colic or pain is usually absent and rarely resembles acute rejection. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 849 consecutive kidney transplant patients in The Rogosin Institute/The Weill-Cornell Medical Center, New York who were transplanted between 1980 and 1997 and had functioning grafts for more than 3 months, to determine the incidence of stone formation, composition, risk factors and patient outcome. RESULTS: At our center, urinary stones were diagnosed in 15 patients (1.8%) of 849 functioning renal grafts for 3 or more months. Of the 15 patients, 10 were males and 5 were females in their third and fourth decade. Eight patients received their transplant from living donors and 7 from cadaveric donors. The stones were first diagnosed between 3 and 109 months after transplantation (mean 17.8 months) and 5 patients had recurrent episodes. The stones were located in the bladder in 11 cases (73.3%), transplanted kidney in 3 cases and in multiple sites in one case. The size of stones varied from 3.4 mm to 40 mm (mean 12 mm). The composition of stones was a mixed form of calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate in 5 cases and 4 patients had infected stones consisting of struvite or mixed form of struvite and calcium phosphate. Factors predisposing to stone formation included tertiary hyperparathyroidism (n=8), hypercalciuria (n=5), recurrent urinary tract infection (n=5), hypocitraturia (n=4), and obstructive uropathy (n=2). Many cases had more than one risk factor. Clinically, painless hematuria was observed in 6 patients and dysuria without bacteriuria in 5 patients. None had renal colic or severe pain at any time. There were no changes in graft function at diagnosis and after removal of stones. Five patients passed stones spontaneously and 8 patients underwent cystoscopy for stone removal. CONCLUSION: Urinary stone formation following kidney transplantation is a rare complication (1.8%). Hyperparathyroidism, hypercalciuria, recurrent urinary tract infection and hypocitraturia are the most common risk factors, but often there are multiple factors which predispose to stone formation. To detect stones and determine their location and size, ultrasonography appears to be the most useful diagnostic tool. Prompt diagnosis, the removal of stones and stone-preventive measures can prevent adverse effects on renal graft outcome.
