Mitigation of Calcification of Heterograft Tissue.
- Author:
Jae Ho AHN
1
;
Se Yong CHOI
;
Sun Kyung MIN
;
Taehee WON
Author Information
1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Mok-dong Hospital, College of Medicine, Ewha Women's University, Seoul, Korea. jhahn@ewha.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Calcification;
Heterograft;
Glutaraldehyde;
Surfactant
- MeSH:
Animals;
Bioprosthesis;
Calcium;
Chitosan;
Collagen;
Glutamic Acid;
Glutaral;
Heterografts*;
Pericardium;
Rats;
Spectrophotometry, Atomic
- From:The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2004;37(4):307-312
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: With the development of cardiac surgical technique, we need more prosthetic materials for repairing the intra- and extracardiac defects. Although bovine pericardial bioprosthesis treated with glutaraldehyde (GA) solution is one of the most popular materials, it has a drawback of later calcific degeneration. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of several materials and methods in reducing the calcific degeneration of bovine pericardium. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Forty square-shaped pieces of bovine pericardia were fixed in 0.625% GA solution with 4 g/L MgCl2.6H2O as a control group (group 1). Other 40 pieces pre-treated with 1% SDS (group 2) and 40 pieces post-treated with 8% glutamate (group 3) and 2% chitosan (group 4) were also fixed in the same GA solution. Other 40 pieces pre-treated with 1% SDS and post-treated with 8% glutamate and 40 pieces post-treated with 2% chitosan were also fixed in the same GA solution (group 5, 6). The pericardial pieces were implanted into the belly of 40 Fisher 344 rats subdermally and were extracted 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months after the implantation. With an atomic absorption spectrophotometry, we measured the calcium amount deposited and examined the tissue with microscope. RESULT: The calcium deposition in 1 month was less in group 2, 5, 6 than that in group 1 (p<0.05). It was most prominent in group 5 (p<0.01). This finding continued in 2 month. In 3 month, the calcium deposition was less in group 3 and 4 as well as group 2, 5, and 6 than in group 1. In 6 month, the calcium deposition in group 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 was less than that in group 1 and the difference was more than that of 1, 2, and 6 month. The microscopic calcium deposition was also less in group 2 and 5. Calcium deposition developed in the whole layer of pericardium, beginning with the surrounding the collagen fiber and progressing inwardly. CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment with SDS, post-treatment with glutamate or chitosan, and SDS pre-treatment and post-treatment with glutamate or chitosan were effective in reducing the calcium deposition in bovine pericardium. Moreover, the combined method of SDS pre-treatment and glutamate post-treatment was more effective than other methods.
