Clinical Significance of Gray-scale Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Ureteral Stone: Need of the New Diagnostic Modalities for the Ureteral Stone in Emergency Room.
- Author:
Won KIM
;
Young Ju LEE
;
Kyoung Soo LIM
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Adult;
Chungcheongnam-do;
Diagnosis*;
Diagnostic Tests, Routine;
Emergencies*;
Emergency Service, Hospital*;
Flank Pain;
Humans;
Odds Ratio;
Physical Examination;
Prospective Studies;
Pyelonephritis;
Ultrasonography*;
Ureter*;
Urinalysis
- From:Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
1999;10(4):654-660
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Ureteral stone(UTS) and acute pyelonephritis are the most common causes of nontraumatic acute flank pain in adults. Urography(IVU) is known as the most ideal diagnostic modality of obstructive uropathy to date. However, it has many practical limitations in overcrowding Korean emergency department to perform IVU as the diagnostic test of UTS. So we have performed prospective analytic study to compare IVU with its alternative diagnostic modalities. METHOD AND RESULTS: Our study was performed at Asan Medical Center from March, 1998 to July, 1999. We performed urinalysis, KUB, grayscale ultrasonography, and IVU in 243 patients, suspected to have UTS, based on histories, physical examination. After excluding patients with undetermined results(n=7) or spontaneous passage of stone before IVU(n=24), 212 patients were enrolled in our study. All of the other diagnostic tests were performed within one hour after emergency room presentation except IVU (53+/-24 hours). Diagnostic agreement among tests are as follows: Urinalysis shows good agreements with KUB(0.53) and IVU(0.62). KUB shows good agreement with IVU(0.48). Ultrasonography shows good agreement with IVU(0.58). Sensitivity(%), specificity(%), positive predicitive value(%), negative predicitive value(%), accuracy(%), and odds ratio of each diagnostic methods are as follows: Urinalysis is 91, 19, 78, 42, 74, 3.88; KUB is 55, 33, 72, 19, 50, 2.49; ultrasonography is 58, 92, 96, 41, 66, 45.61, and IVU is 81, 96, 98, 62, 84, 107.72. CONCLUSION: Although IVU seems to be the most ideal diagnostic modality for the UTS to date, it takes too long time for emergency physicians to confirm the diagnostic using IVU. We can performed other diagnostic modalities within one hour. However, emergency physicians suffer from poor diagnostic accuracy. Therefore, it is concluded that we are in need of more accurate alternative diagnostic modalities for UTS.
