Beam Shaping by Independent Jaw Closure in Stereotactic Radiotherapy.
- Author:
Yong Chan AHN
1
;
Byung Chul CHO
;
David R CHOI
;
Dae Yong KIM
;
Seung Jae HUH
;
Do Hoon OH
;
Hoonsik BAE
;
In Hwan YEO
;
Young Eun KO
Author Information
1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Stereotactic radiation therapy;
Beam shaping
- MeSH:
Axis, Cervical Vertebra;
Brain;
Film Dosimetry;
Head;
Jaw*;
Neck;
Neoplasm Metastasis;
Radiotherapy*;
Water
- From:The Journal of the Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
2000;18(2):150-156
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) can deliver highly focused radiation to a small and spherical target lesion with very high degree of mechanical accuracy. For non-spherical and large lesions, however, inclusion of the neighboring normal structures within the high dose radiation volume is inevitable in SRT. This is to report the beam shaping using the partial closure of the independent jaw in SRT and the verification of dose calculation and the dose display using a home-made soft ware. MATERIALS & METHODS: Authors adopted the idea to partially close one or more independent collimator jaw(s) in addition to the circular collimator cones to shield the neighboring normal structures while keeping the target lesion within the radiation beam field at all angles along the arc trajectory. The output factors (OF's) and the tissue-maximum ratios (TMR's) were measured using the micro ion chamber in the water phantom dosimetry system, and were compared with the theoretical calculations. A film dosimetry procedure was performed to obtain the depth dose profiles at 5 cm, and they were also compared with the theoretical calculations, where the radiation dose would depend on the actual area of irradiation. Authors incorporated this algorithm into the home-made SRT software for the isodose calculation and display, and was tried on an example case with single brain metastasis. The dose-volume histograms (DVH's) of the planning target volume (PTV) and the normal brain derived by the control plan were reciprocally compared with those derived by the plan using the same arc arrangement plus the independent collimator jaw closure. RESULTS: When using 5.0 cm diameter collimator, the measurements of the OF's and the TMR's with one independent jaw set at 30 mm (unblocked), 15.5 mm, 8.6 mm, and 0 mm from the central beam axis showed good correlation to the theoretical calculation within 0.5% and 0.3% error range. The dose profiles at 5 cm depth obtained by the film dosimetry also showed very good correlation to the theoretical calculations. The isodose profiles obtained on the home-made software demonstrated a slightly more conformal dose distribution around the target lesion by using the independent jaw closure, where the DVH's of the PTV were almost equivalent on the two plans, while the DVH's for the normal brain showed that less volume of the normal brain receiving high radiation dose by using this modification than the control plan employing the circular collimator cone only. CONCLUSION: With the beam shaping modification using the independent jaw closure, authors have realized wider clinical application of SRT with more conformal dose planning. Authors believe that SRT, with beam shaping ideas and efforts, should no longer be limited to the small spherical lesions, but be more widely applied to rather irregularly shaped tumors in the intracranial and the head and neck regions.
