Reconstruction of Large Facial Defects via Excision of Skin Cancer Using Two or More Regional Flaps.
10.5999/aps.2017.44.4.319
- Author:
Dong Min LEE
1
;
Yong Chan BAE
;
Su Bong NAM
;
Seong Hwan BAE
;
June Seok CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea. baeyc2@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Mohs surgery;
Multiple flaps;
Large defects
- MeSH:
Busan;
Carcinoma, Basal Cell;
Esthetics;
Female;
Follow-Up Studies;
Forehead;
Hematoma;
Humans;
Male;
Methods;
Mohs Surgery;
Necrosis;
Patient Satisfaction;
Skin Neoplasms*;
Skin Transplantation;
Skin*;
Wounds and Injuries
- From:Archives of Plastic Surgery
2017;44(4):319-323
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Free-flap surgery and skin grafting can be used to reconstruct large facial defects that may result after skin cancer removal by Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). However, these two methods may produce low postsurgical patient satisfaction with aesthetics, and free-flap surgery may produce an undue burden for the majority of skin cancer patients, who are of advanced age. Hence, the authors examined outcomes of large facial defect reconstruction using multiple flaps. METHODS: Among patients undergoing MMS for skin cancer at Pusan National University Hospital between January 2013 and December 2015, we evaluated 7 patients (2 males, 5 females; average age, 73.14 years) treated for large facial defects from basal cell carcinoma. Based on operative and follow-up records, we investigated the number and type of flaps used, postsurgical complications, and patients' post-surgical satisfaction. RESULTS: Two and 3 types of flaps were used for 5 and 2 patients, respectively. Most frequently used were nasolabial flaps (7 times in 6 patients) and forehead flaps (once in each of 4 patients). The average follow-up period was 14 months, with no complications—including necrosis, hematoma, or wound dehiscence—observed. Post-surgical satisfaction averaged 4.4 out of a maximum of 5 points. CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction using two or more flaps for large facial defects after skin cancer removal using MMS produced satisfactory outcomes while preventing aesthetic problems. Practitioners should consider using multiple flaps when choosing a reconstruction method for large facial defects following skin cancer removal.
