How Can We Maximize Skills for Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Injection, Clipping, Burning, or Others?.
- Author:
Il Kwun CHUNG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea. euschung@schmc.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Non-variceal UGI bleeding;
Endoscopy;
Hemostasis
- MeSH:
Burns;
Christianity;
Endoscopy;
Hemorrhage;
Hemostasis;
Hemostasis, Endoscopic;
Humans;
Peptic Ulcer
- From:Clinical Endoscopy
2012;45(3):230-234
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Endoscopy has its role in the primary diagnosis and management of acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Main roles of endoscopy are identifying high risk stigmata lesion, and performing endoscopic hemostasis to lower the rebleeding and mortality risks. Early endoscopy within the first 24 hours enables risk classification according to clinical and endoscopic criteria, which guide safe and prompt discharge of low risk patients, and improve outcomes of high risk patients. Techniques including injection therapy, ablative therapy and mechanical therapy have been studied over the recent decades. Combined treatment is more effective than injection treatment, and single treatment with mechanical or thermal method is safe and effective in peptic ulcer bleeding. Specific treatment and correct decisions are needed in various situations depending on the site, location, specific characteristics of lesion and patient's clinical conditions.
