Assessment of Bone Metastasis using Nuclear Medicine Imaging in Breast Cancer: Comparison between PET/CT and Bone Scan.
- Author:
Dae Hyoun CHO
1
;
Byeong Cheol AHN
;
Sung Min KANG
;
Ji Hyoung SEO
;
Jin Ho BAE
;
Sang Woo LEE
;
Jin Hyang JEONG
;
Jeongsoo YOO
;
Ho Young PARK
;
Jaetae LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National Unversity Medical School, Daegu, Korea. abc2000@knu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
PET/CT;
bone scan;
breast cancer;
osseous metastasis
- MeSH:
Breast Neoplasms*;
Breast*;
Clavicle;
Diagnosis;
Fasting;
Female;
Femur;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Humerus;
Neoplasm Metastasis*;
Nuclear Medicine*;
Pelvis;
Positron-Emission Tomography;
Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography*;
Respiration;
Ribs;
Scapula;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Skeleton;
Skull;
Spine;
Sternum;
Technetium Tc 99m Medronate;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- From:Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
2007;41(1):30-41
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Bone metastasis in breast cancer patients are usually assessed by conventional Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate whole-body bone scan, which has a high sensitivity but a poor specificity. However, positron emission tomography with 18F-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET) can offer superior spatial resolution and improved specificity. FDG-PET/CT can offer more information to assess bone metastasis than PET alone, by giving a anatomical information of non-enhanced CT image. We attempted to evaluate the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for detecting bone metastasis in breast cancer and to compare FDG-PET/CT results with bone scan findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 157 women patients (range: 28~78 years old, mean+/-SD=49.5+/-8.5) with biopsy-proven breast cancer who underwent bone scan and FDG-PET/CT within 1 week interval. The final diagnosis of bone metastasis was established by histopathological findings, radiological correlation, or clinical follow-up. Bone scan was acquired over 4 hours after administration of 740 MBq Tc-99m MDP. Bone scan image was interpreted as normal, low, intermediate or high probability for osseous metastasis. FDG PET/CT was performed after 6 hours fasting. 370 MBq F-18 FDG was administered intravenously 1 hour before imaging. PET data was obtained by 3D mode and CT data, used as transmission correction database, was acquired during shallow respiration. PET images were evaluated by visual interpretation, and quantification of FDG accumulation in bone lesion was performed by maximal SUV(SUVmax) and relative SUV(SUVrel). RESULTS: Six patients(4.4%) showed metastatic bone lesions. Four(66.6%) of 6 patients with osseous metastasis was detected by bone scan and all 6 patients(100%) were detected by PET/CT. A total of 135 bone lesions found on either FDG-PET or bone scan were consist of 108 osseous metastatic lesion and 27 benign bone lesions. Osseous metastatic lesion had higher SUVmax and SUVrel compared to benign bone lesion(4.79+/-3.32 vs 1.45+/-0.44, p=0.000, 3.08+/-2.85 vs 0.30+/-0.43, p=0.000). Among 108 osseous metastatic lesions, 76 lesions showed as abnormal uptake on bone scan, and 76 lesions also showed as increased FDG uptake on PET/CT scan. There was good agreement between FDG uptake and abnormal bone scan finding (Kendall tau-b: 0.689, p=0.000). Lesion showed increased bone tracer uptake had higher SUVmax and SUVrel compared to lesion showed no abnormal bone scan finding (6.03+/-3.12 vs 1.09+/-1.49, p=0.000, 4.76+/-3.31 vs 1.29+/-0.92, p=0.000). The order of frequency of osseous metastatic site was vertebra, pelvis, rib, skull, sternum, scapula, femur, clavicle, and humerus. Metastatic lesion on skull had highest SUVmax and metastatic lesion on rib had highest SUVrel. Osteosclerotic metastatic lesion had lowest SUVmax and SUVrel. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that FDG-PET/CT is more sensitive to detect breast cancer patients with osseous metastasis. CT scan must be reviewed cautiously skeleton with bone window, because osteosclerotic metastatic lesion did not showed abnormal FDG accumulation frequently.
