Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients over 75 Years of Age: Clinical Outcome and Repair Integrity.
10.4055/cios.2016.8.4.420
- Author:
Jung Gwan PARK
1
;
Nam Su CHO
;
Jong Hoon SONG
;
Jong Hun BAEK
;
Ho Yeon JEONG
;
Yong Girl RHEE
Author Information
1. Shoulder & Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. shoulderrhee@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Shoulder;
Rotator cuff;
Aged;
Treatment outcome
- MeSH:
Aged;
California;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Odds Ratio;
Rotator Cuff*;
Shoulder;
Tears;
Treatment Outcome;
Visual Analog Scale
- From:Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
2016;8(4):420-427
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Some studies have shown significant functional improvement after rotator cuff (RC) repair in elderly patients. However, few studies have reported the healing potential of RC tears in elderly patients. METHODS: Twenty-five patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent RC repair were enrolled. The mean age at the time of surgery was 78.3 years (range, 75 to 88 years) while the mean follow-up was 36.3 months (range, 18 to 114 months). We evaluated clinical and structural outcomes after RC repair in the retear and healed groups. RESULTS: Of 25 patients, 16 (64%) had healed RC lesions and 9 (36%) had retorn cuff lesions. The retear rate increased significantly with increasing initial tear size (small to medium, 13%; large, 60%; massive, 80%; p = 0.024) but not with increasing age (p = 0.072). The mean visual analog scale (VAS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), and Constant scores significantly improved from 5.2, 15.8, and 49.3 preoperatively to 1.4, 31.1, and 71.9 in the healed group and from 6.0, 14.4, and 39.5 preoperatively to 2.4, 28.3, and 63.6 in the retear group at the final follow-up (p < 0.05, respectively). There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 groups at the final follow-up. Retear was significantly correlated with initial tear size (p = 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 2.771; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.394 to 5.509 for large to massive tears) (p = 0.001; OR, 0.183; 95% CI, 0.048 to 0.692 for small to medium tears). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant improvements in clinical outcomes after RC repair in patients ≥ 75 years. Structural integrity after cuff repair did not affect the final clinical outcome. Even in elderly patients aged ≥ 75 years, healing of repaired RC can be expected in cases of small to medium tears. Although the retear rate was relatively high for large to massive tears, clinical outcomes still showed significant improvement.
