Clinical Results Comparing Transurethral Needle Ablation with Transurethral Resection of Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
- Author:
Sei Kwon OH
1
;
Kyu Sung LEE
;
Han Yong CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Sung Kyun Kwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Benign prostatic hypertrophy;
Transurethral needle ablation;
Transurethral resection
- MeSH:
Catheterization;
Catheters;
Ejaculation;
Erectile Dysfunction;
Humans;
Length of Stay;
Male;
Needles*;
Prostate;
Prostatic Hyperplasia*;
Quality of Life;
Transurethral Resection of Prostate*;
Tuna;
Urinary Incontinence
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1998;39(8):777-782
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: We compared the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with that of transurethral needle ablation(TUNA) of the prostate in patient with BPH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 1996 to April 1997, 21 patients were treated with TURP and 25 with TUNA. In TURP group, the mean age was 67.2 years and mean prostatic volume was 52.7ml. In TUNA group, the mean age was 67.2 years and mean prostatic volume was 32.1ml. Assessment parameters were International Prostate Symptom Score(1-PSS), quality of life question, uroflowmetry and complications. Post-treatment morbidity was noted if the patients experienced erectile dysfunction, retrograde ejaculation or urinary incontinence. Patients were examined at 3 months from the day of treatment. RESULTS: At 3 months, the maximum flow rate improved from the mean of 10.2+/- 3.2m1/sec to 20.5+/-10.7m1/sec for the TURP group and 9.3+/-1.9m1/sec to 12.5+/-4.3 for the TUNA group. 1-PSS improved from the mean 22.0+/-7.6 to 6.4+/-4.6 for the TURP group and 21.2+/-6.6 to 13.1+/-6.8 for the TUNA group. Quality of life improved from the mean 3.8)1.6 to 1.3+/-1.0 for the TURP group and 4.3+/-0.9 to 2.9+/-1.1 for the TUNA group. Erectile dysfunction was reported in 43% (9/21) of TURP and 5%(1/20) of TUNA. Retrograde ejaculation was reported in 57%(12/21) and urinary incontinence was in 5%(1/21) of TURP. Retrograde ejaculation and urinary incontinence was not reported with TUNA. The mean operation time, hospital stay and a catheterization time in the TUNA group were 45.4min, 1.2days, 4.4days in comparison with 58.7min, 7.0days, 3.6days in the TURP group. CONCLUSIONS: After TURP and TUNA, there was significant improvement in all clinical parameters. But TURP was more effective in improving maximum flow rate, 1-PSS and quality of life. TUNA, however, produced minimal morbidity with no serious complication. With acceptable low morbidity, TUNA appears to be a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of BPH.
