The Effect of Interpregnancy Interval on Birth Weight.
10.12701/yujm.1989.6.2.173
- Author:
Kwang Yeul LEE
;
Jun SAKONG
;
Seok Beom KIM
;
Chang Yoon KIM
;
Pock Soo KANG
;
Jong Hak CHUNG
- Publication Type:Original Article
- MeSH:
Bays;
Birth Intervals;
Birth Weight*;
Body Weight;
Child;
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology);
Daegu;
Female;
Hospitals, General;
Humans;
Infant, Low Birth Weight;
Infant, Newborn;
Maternal Age;
Mothers;
Occupations;
Parturition*;
Schools, Nursing
- From:Yeungnam University Journal of Medicine
1989;6(2):173-181
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The effect of interpregnancy interval on birthweight of the subsequent child was investigated for the 1,347 women of 25 to 40yearsold age who visited OBGY and Pediatric department of the general hospital in Taegu city. Questions in designed questionnaire were asked by student interviewers who were trained in nursing school. Mean birth weight by interpregnancy intervals were compared by intervals of 6 months. Mean birth weight increased from 3,250 grams for intervals of 6 months to 3,357 grams for intervals of 25-30 months, but the difference was not statistically significant (=0.47). Correlations between the continuous variables which were suspected as confounders and interpregnancy interval and birth weight were investigated. The coefficient of correlation between maternal age and interpregnancy interval was 0.39, between gestational period and birth weight 0.30 and between prepregnancy weight and birth weight 0.16 and between birth weight of first baby and birth weight (of second baby) 0.44. But maternal age, gestational period and prepregnancy weight were not considered as confounder, because they were not correlated simultaneously with birth interval and birth weight. Associations between the discrete variables which were suspected as confounders, and interpregnancy interval were investigated by Chi-square test. Associations between interpregancy interval and educational level of mothers, types of husband's occupation, types of medical security, sex were not significant (P-values were 0.59, 0.75, 0.75, 0.82 respectively), so we did not considered these variables as confounding variables. In multiple regression analysis of birth weight, significant variables were birth weight of first baby, gestational analysis of birth weight, significant variables were birth weight of first bay, gestational period, sex of neonate and prepregnancy body weight of mother. Of the 1,347 births, the rate of low birth weight was 2% (27 birth). The rate for interpregnancy interval 7-12months was highest as 3.6% and that for 13-18 months was lowest as 0.6%, but there was no regular tendency related with interpregnancy interval.
