Color variation induced by abutments in the superior anterior maxilla: an in vitro study in the pig gingiva.
- Author:
Ramin ATASH
1
;
Mohamed Reda BOULARBAH
;
Cetik SIBEL
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Abutment; Zirconium oxide; Anterior restoration; Gingiva
- MeSH: Gingiva*; In Vitro Techniques*; Maxilla*; Titanium; Zirconium
- From:The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2016;8(6):423-432
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this work is to evaluate different types of materials used for making implant abutments, by means of an in vitro study and a review of the literature, in order to identify the indications for a better choice of an implant-supported restoration in the anterior section. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 5 implant abutments were tested in a random order in the superior anterior maxilla of pig gingiva (n = 8): titanium dioxide (Nobel Biocare); zirconium dioxide, Standard BO shade (Nobel Biocare, Kloten, Switzerland); zirconium dioxide, Light BI shade (Nobel Biocare); zirconium dioxide, Intense A 3.5 shade (Nobel Biocare); and aluminium oxide. Each abutment was tested for 2 mm and 3 mm thickness. To determine color variation, VITA Easyshade Advance spectrophotometer (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, Germany) was used. RESULTS: Results showed that the color variation induced by the abutment would be affected by the abutment material and gingival thickness, when the gingival thickness is 2 mm. All materials except zirconium dioxide (Standard shade) caused a visible change of color. Then, as the thickness of the gingiva increased to 3 mm, the color variation was attenuated in a significant manner and became invisible for all types of abutments, except those made of aluminium oxide. CONCLUSION: Zirconium dioxide is the material causing the lowest color variation at 2 mm and at 3 mm, whereas aluminium oxide causes the highest color variation no matter the thickness.
