Effects of Neostigmine on Tracheal Smooth Muscle Contraction in Rabbits.
10.4097/kjae.2001.41.1.71
- Author:
Tae Hyun KIM
1
;
Jae Young SHIM
;
Hue Jung PARK
;
Ou Kyoung KWON
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology, Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Airway: tracheal smooth muscle;
Antagonist, miscellaneous: neostigmine;
Muscle, skeletal: acetylcholine receptor
- MeSH:
Acetylcholine;
Anesthesia, General;
Cholinesterases;
Diaphragm;
Metabolism;
Muscle Contraction;
Muscle, Skeletal;
Muscle, Smooth*;
Neostigmine*;
Neuromuscular Blockade;
Rabbits*
- From:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
2001;41(1):71-76
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Neostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, is known to reverse the neuromuscular blocking action induced by nondepolarizing muscle relaxants at the end of general anesthesia. Some authors, however, reported that neostigmine has the properties of a neuromuscular block in skeletal muscles while others reported that neostigmine caused the smooth muscles such as the diaphragm to relax rather than to contract. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of neostigmine at different doses on the tracheal smooth muscle in rabbits. METHODS: Isolated tracheal ring preparation in rabbits was used. Groups were divided into 7 groups; acetylcholine group (acetylcholine cumulative administered at doses of 10 8, 10 7, 10 6, 10 5, 10 4 and 10 3 M), neostigmine group (neostigmine cumulative administered at doses of 10 8, 10 7, 10 6, 10 5, 10 4 and 10 3 M), acetylcholine 10 6 M + neostigmine group (acetylcholine 10 6 M prior to neostigmine administered at doses of 10 8, 10 7, 10 6, 10 5, 10 4 and 10 3 M), acetylcholine 10 4 M + neostigmine group (acetylcholine 10 4 M prior to neostigmine administered at doses of 10 8, 10 7, 10 6, 10 5, 10 4 and 10 3 M), neostigmine 10 5, 10 4 and 10 3 M groups (neostigmine administered at doses of 10 5, 10 4 and 10 3 M). Smooth muscle contraction was evaluated in isometric tension per gram of tissue. RESULTS: In the acetylcholine group, the contractions increased as the dosage increased (10 8 10 3 M). In the neostigmine group, the contractions increased as the dosage increased (10 8 10 4 M), but at 10 3 M of neostigmine, contractions suddenly decreased. In addition when acetylcholine 10 6 M was given as a pretreatment, there was a sudden decrease in muscle contractions induced by neostigmine at 10 3 M. Also the contractions induced by 10 3 M neostigmine were less than that of 10 4 and 10 5 M. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that neostigmine caused smooth muscle contraction at low concentrations by blocking acetylcholine metabolism, but at high concentrations, smooth muscle contractions were decreased and this might be due to direct action at the acetylcholine receptor.
