The effect of different oxygen administration under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.
10.4097/kjae.2009.57.6.709
- Author:
Eun Hee CHUN
1
;
Jong Hak KIM
;
Youn Jin KIM
;
Hee Jung BAIK
;
Joo Hyun JUN
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea. ankyj@ewha.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Randomized Controlled Trial
- Keywords:
Cesarean section;
Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia;
Oxygen administration
- MeSH:
Anesthesia;
Anesthesia, Conduction;
Carbon Dioxide;
Cesarean Section;
Female;
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration;
Masks;
Oxygen;
Partial Pressure;
Pregnancy
- From:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
2009;57(6):709-713
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: During cesarean section under regional anesthesia, it is current practice to provide the parturient with a source of supplemental oxygen. We compared the effect of high flow oxygen by mask with that of low flow oxygen by nasal prongs. METHODS: Fifty eight parturients presenting for elective cesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of the three groups to be given either oxygen 4 L/min by mask, oxygen 8 L/min by mask or oxygen 2 L/min by nasal prongs. Umbilical arterial and venous blood samples were taken and analysed immediately after delivery. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the umbilical arterial or venous pH, partial pressure of oxygen and partial pressure of carbon dioxide among the three groups. In neonatal outcome, there were no differences in Apgar scores. CONCLUSIONS: It Makes No Differences Whether The Parturients Received Supplemental Oxygen By Nasal Prongs Or Simple Face Mask During Cesarean Section Under Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia.
