Analysis of Frequency of Use of Different Scar Assessment Scales Based on the Scar Condition and Treatment Method.
10.5999/aps.2014.41.2.111
- Author:
Seong Hwan BAE
1
;
Yong Chan BAE
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea. baeyc2@hanmail.net
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Cicatrix;
Keloid;
Visual analog scale
- MeSH:
Cicatrix*;
Consensus;
Humans;
Keloid;
Methods;
Visual Analog Scale;
Weights and Measures*
- From:Archives of Plastic Surgery
2014;41(2):111-115
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Analysis of scars in various conditions is essential, but no consensus had been reached on the scar assessment scale to select for a given condition. We reviewed papers to determine the scar assessment scale selected depending on the scar condition and treatment method. We searched PubMed for articles published since 2000 with the contents of the scar evaluation using a scar assessment scale with a Journal Citation Report impact factor >0.5. Among them, 96 articles that conducted a scar evaluation using a scar assessment scale were reviewed and analyzed. The scar assessment scales were identified and organized by various criteria. Among the types of scar assessment scales, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was found to be the most frequently used scale. As for the assessment of newly developed operative scars, the POSAS was most used. Meanwhile, for categories depending on the treatment methods for preexisting scars, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used in 6 studies following a laser treatment, the POSAS was used in 7 studies following surgical treatment, and the POSAS was used in 7 studies following a conservative treatment. Within the 12 categories of scar status, the VSS showed the highest frequency in 6 categories and the POSAS showed the highest frequency in the other 6 categories. According to our reviews, the POSAS and VSS are the most frequently used scar assessment scales. In the future, an optimal, universal scar scoring system is needed in order to better evaluate and treat pathologic scarring.
