The Results of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment by Transurethral Resection, Open Prostatectomy, and TUMT(Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy).
- Author:
Hyun Seok CHANG
1
;
Nak Gyeu CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
BPH;
Thermotherapy;
TUR-P;
Open prostatectomy
- MeSH:
Humans;
Hyperthermia, Induced;
Microwaves*;
Prescriptions;
Prostatectomy*;
Prostatic Hyperplasia*
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
1994;35(4):370-375
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
We noticed the treatment results of each of them after having treated the seventy-nine cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia with TUMT (N=32, Term ; 92.6-93.3), TUR-P (N=31, Term; 91.4-93.3), open prostatectomy (N=16, Term; 91.4-93.3). However, there was a difficulty to get to statistical reliability, for there was a little gap between the term of survey and the period of treatment of three groups. The results are following. In the TUMT, the maximal flow rate was improved from 8.2ml/s to 13.3ml/s and Madsen score dropped from 13.6 to 5.3, in the TUR-P they were 8.4ml/s to 16.5ml /s and 14.5 to 5.3 respectively, and in the open prostatectomy 6.8ml/s to 20.0ml/s and 15.8 to 5. 3 respectively. The degree of satisfaction of the patients themselves with each prescription was 46.9% in the TUMT. 67.7% in the TUR-P and 81.2% in the open prostatectomy. But 18.8% and l6.l% of the patients thought TUMT and TUR-P respectively ineffective. The conclusion is that open prostatectomy presented the better results than TUMT or TUR-P in the degree of satisfaction of patients and uroflowmetry during the survey period. And even though TUMT have presented lesser degree of satisfaction then TUR-P up to now, if the exact indications for the use of TUMT are found and the mechanical improvements undergo, then a number of benign prostatic hyperplasia cases seem to be treated in more safety and with lesser cost and time by TUMT instead of TUR-P.
