Investigation of osseointegration according to the healing time after having iatrogenic mobility of implant fixtures.
10.4047/jkap.2010.48.4.308
- Author:
Yun Jin HWANG
1
;
Jin Hyun CHO
;
Cheong Hee LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. chlee@knu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Re-osseointegration;
Removal torque (RT)
- MeSH:
Female;
Humans;
Implants, Experimental;
Light;
Osseointegration;
Osteogenesis;
Rabbits;
Tetracycline;
Tibia;
Titanium;
Torque
- From:The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2010;48(4):308-314
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to analyze the change in re-osseointegration over time and bone reaction at the interface between implant fixture and the surface of the bone, after destroying re-osseointegration by distorting the bone-implant interface artificially. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Experimental implant fixtures (cp titanium, small ef, Cyrillic3.75 mm x 4 mm) which didn't have surface treatment were produced. Two or three fixtures were implanted on both tibias of twelve female rabbits (New Zealand white, more than 3.5 kg). Then after six weeks, removal torque (RT) was measured and the results were recorded as the first measurement values. The fixtures were submerged again to get reosseointegration between the bone and fixture. To identify the change in re-osseointegration of submerged fixtures over time, six groups had the healing time for four days (group I), one week (group II), two weeks (group III), three weeks (group IV), four weeks (group V) and five weeks (group VI), and then the secondary removal torque was measured for each group. To identify the bone formation under fluorescent light, tetracycline (15 mg/kg, IM) were treated on the rabbits of each group. After the second measurement, the rabbits were sacrificed, and 16 slides were made, two or three for each group. The slides were observed under the fluorescent light with light microscope. To find out the change in the secondary removal torque over the primary removal torque in progress of time, the averages of the increase rate of the primary and secondary torque removal force were calculated. Then, to find out if there were any critical differences between the primary removal torque and the secondary removal torque in each group and among the groups, the results were analyzed statistically by paired t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Duncan's Multiple Range Test. RESULTS: In group I and II, secondary removal torque decreased, especially in group I. In group III, IV, V, and VI, secondary removal torque increased critically. Comparing the differences among the groups, the critical difference was shown between group I, II and group III, IV, V, VI. Mineralization at the interface between the bone and implant fixture was identified from the first week, and bone formation was shown more clearly from the second week. CONCLUSION: If the implant fixture remains unforced for a certain period of time after the fixture has had iatrogenic mobility, re-osseointegration occurs at the surface of the fixture, and for tibias of rabbits, higher re-osseointegration was obtained within two weeks.
