Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using da VinciTM Surgical Robotic System: Initial Korean Experience.
- Author:
Geun Soo KONG
1
;
Youl Keun SEONG
;
Gyung Tak SUNG
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Dong-A University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea. sunggt@daunet.donga.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Robotics;
Surgery;
Prostatectomy;
Laparoscopy
- MeSH:
Busan;
Follow-Up Studies;
Freedom;
Hospitals, General;
Humans;
Joints;
Korea;
Laparoscopy;
Length of Stay;
Lymph Node Excision;
Neoplasm Grading;
Operative Time;
Prostatectomy*;
Range of Motion, Articular;
Robotics;
Singapore
- From:Korean Journal of Urology
2005;46(4):353-359
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: In 2004, a joint effort was undertaken between Dong-a University Hospital, Busan, Korea and Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, to promote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) to yet another level by enhancing the human performance using a master-slave manipulator, the da VinciTM System. Herein, we report our initial experience of employing robotic telepresent technology to perform a LRP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 6-port modified transperitoneal approach was used. The da VinciTM System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., California) consists of three components: a surgeon console, a robotic manipulator and a vision cart. Cable-driven mechanical "Endowrist" instruments are capable of delivering a complete range of motion at the instrument tips, allowing a total of 6 degrees of freedom. RESULTS: Five robotic-assisted LRP were performed. The mean patient age PSA and Gleason score were 65 years, 7.8ng/ml and 6.2, respectively. Overall, the system functioned well, without significant intraoperative errors. The mean operative time was 185 minutes in 2 patients with preservation of the neurovascular bundle, and 154 minutes in 2 patients with non-nerve sparing. In one patient, a bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed, with an operative time of 195 minutes. The mean blood loss and hospital stay were 245cc and 2.5 days, respectively. All patients maintained continence at 3 month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Intuitive hand-eye coordination, superb depth of perception and "Endowrist" instruments allowed tissue handling and suturing quite feasible during the LRP. Continuous effort is underway to further the surgical experience and advances in robotic technology. We believe robotic surgical systems will greatly facilitate and improve the LRP procedure.
