A comparison of the periumbilical incision and the intraumbilical incision in laparoscopic appendectomy.
10.4174/jkss.2012.83.6.360
- Author:
Jun Suh LEE
1
;
Tae Ho HONG
;
Jun Gi KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Armed Forces Capital Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Intraumbilical;
Laparoscopic technique;
Appendectomy
- MeSH:
Appendectomy;
Appendicitis;
Bacteria;
Cosmetics;
Humans;
Laparoscopy;
Length of Stay;
Retrospective Studies;
Umbilicus;
Wound Infection
- From:Journal of the Korean Surgical Society
2012;83(6):360-366
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The intraumbilical incision is being used more frequently, with increasing cases of single incision laparoscopic surgery. Since the umbilicus is deeper than the surrounding wall, it has abundant bacteria. No study has compared the adverse outcomes of periumbilical and intraumbilical incisions. We analyzed the wound complication rates of perforated appendicitis patients according to the types of umbilical incision. METHODS: A retrospective review was done of 280 patients with perforated appendicitis. One hundred fifty nine patients were treated with the intraumbilical incision, and 121 patients were treated with the periumbilical incision. We compared the perioperative outcomes according to each laparoscopic incision. RESULTS: There was no difference in operation time, postoperative hospital stay and analgesic requirement between the two groups. One case in the intraumbilical group (0.6%) and three cases in the periumbilical group (2.5%) developed wound infections. The umbilical complication rate showed no difference. CONCLUSION: The wound complication rate of intraumbilical and periumbilical incisions are not different. Although this retrospective study has inherent limitations, the intraumbilical incision seems to be a safe and feasible alternative for the periumbilical incision that can be easier to perform, with better cosmetic results.
